The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scalable and Secure Sharing of Personal Health Records in Cloud Computing Using Attribute-Based Encryption
Abstract
Personal health record (PHR) is an emerging patient-centric model of health information exchange, which is often outsourced to be stored at a third party, such as cloud providers. However, there have been wide privacy concerns as personal health information could be exposed to those third party servers and to unauthorized parties. To assure the patients' control over access to their own PHRs, it is a promising method to encrypt the PHRs before outsourcing. Yet, issues such as risks of privacy exposure, scalability in key management, flexible access, and efficient user revocation, have remained the most important challenges toward achieving fine-grained, cryptographically enforced data access control. In this paper, we propose a novel patient-centric framework and a suite of mechanisms for data access control to PHRs stored in semitrusted servers. To achieve fine-grained and scalable data access control for PHRs, we leverage attribute-based encryption (ABE) techniques to encrypt each patient's PHR file. Different from previous works in secure data outsourcing, we focus on the multiple data owner scenario, and divide the users in the PHR system into multiple security domains that greatly reduces the key management complexity for owners and users. A high degree of patient privacy is guaranteed simultaneously by exploiting multiauthority ABE. Our scheme also enables dynamic modification of access policies or file attributes, supports efficient on-demand user/attribute revocation and break-glass access under emergency scenarios. Extensive analytical and experimental results are presented which show the security, scalability, and efficiency of our proposed scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption
Bethencourt, J., Sahai, A., & Waters, B. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP '07) · doi:10.1109/sp.2007.11 · Cited by 5,131
Cited by
Blockchain: A Panacea for Healthcare Cloud-Based Data Security and Privacy?
Esposito, C., De Santis, A., Tortora, G., Chang, H., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2018) · IEEE Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/mcc.2018.011791712 · Cited by 855
Hassanalieragh, M., Page, A., Soyata, T., Sharma, G., Aktas, M., Mateos, G., Kantarci, B., & Andreescu, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/scc.2015.47 · Cited by 787
Securing Fog Computing for Internet of Things Applications: Challenges and Solutions
Ni, J., Zhang, K., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2762345 · Cited by 659
MedBlock: Efficient and Secure Medical Data Sharing Via Blockchain
Fan, K., Wang, S., Ren, Y., Li, H., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0993-7 · Cited by 631
Aceto, G., Persico, V., & Pescapé, A. (2018) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.02.008 · Cited by 504
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, M., Yu, S., Zheng, Y., Ren, K., & Lou, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-143
- ISSN
- 1045-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118875948
- Cited by
- 1,189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 244.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scalable and Secure Sharing of Personal Health Records in Cloud Computing Using Attribute-Based Encryption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpds.2012.97
- The paper
- Li, M., Yu, S., Zheng, Y., Ren, K., & Lou, W. (2013). Scalable and Secure Sharing of Personal Health Records in Cloud Computing Using Attribute-Based Encryption. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpds.2012.97
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.