Cited by 631Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityElectronic Health Records SystemsBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

MedBlock: Efficient and Secure Medical Data Sharing Via Blockchain

Fan, Kai, Wang, Shangyang, Ren, Yanhui, Li, Hui, Yang, Yintang·2018·Journal of Medical Systems

Abstract

With the development of electronic information technology, electronic medical records (EMRs) have been a common way to store the patients' data in hospitals. They are stored in different hospitals' databases, even for the same patient. Therefore, it is difficult to construct a summarized EMR for one patient from multiple hospital databases due to the security and privacy concerns. Meanwhile, current EMRs systems lack a standard data management and sharing policy, making it difficult for pharmaceutical scientists to develop precise medicines based on data obtained under different policies. To solve the above problems, we proposed a blockchain-based information management system, MedBlock, to handle patients' information. In this scheme, the distributed ledger of MedBlock allows the efficient EMRs access and EMRs retrieval. The improved consensus mechanism achieves consensus of EMRs without large energy consumption and network congestion. In addition, MedBlock also exhibits high information security combining the customized access control protocols and symmetric cryptography. MedBlock can play an important role in the sensitive medical information sharing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-018-0993-7

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, K., Wang, S., Ren, Y., Li, H., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
Xidian University (CN)
Corresponding author
Fan, Kai
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2018-06-21
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
136-136
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W2809143401
Cited by
631
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 2
FWCI
86.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB0802300)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772403, U1401251)
  • Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2017JM6004)
  • National 111 Program of China (B16037, B08038)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
electronic health records, health data sharing, blockchain, distributed ledger technology, consensus algorithms, access control, symmetric encryption, data privacy, personalized medicine
MeSH terms
Confidentiality, Humans, Computer Security, Privacy, Information Dissemination, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review