Cited by 85Optimal Power Flow DistributionElectric Power System OptimizationPower System Optimization and Stability

A Survey on Applications of Machine Learning for Optimal Power Flow

Open access
Hasan, Fouad, Kargarian, Amin, Mohammadi, Ali·2020·2020 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)

Abstract

Optimal power flow (OPF) is at the heart of many power system operation tools and market clearing processes. Several mathematical and heuristic approaches have been presented in literature to solve OPF. The recent flourish of machine learning (ML) algorithms and advancement of computational resources, with unforeseen data availability, has motivated the power system community to embrace ML. Although many papers are published on the applications of ML for solving various power system problems, in case of OPF, the same research orientation is still in its early days. This paper presents a survey of recent studies that have applied ML to solve OPF-related problems and provides readers with visions on potential research directions in this field. The surveyed literature is categorized according to the type of studied OPF problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpec48276.2020.9042547

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML can help improve the existing centralized process of scheduling and dispatch by speeding up power system optimization problems and improving the quality of optimization solutions.

    “ML can help improve the existing (centralized) process of scheduling and dispatch by speeding up power system optimization problems and improving the quality of optimization solutions [333,608].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [333]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasan, F., Kargarian, A., & Mohammadi, A.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-02
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W3012106393
Cited by
85
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
14.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC) (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
Keywords
optimal power flow, machine learning applications, power system operation, market clearing, research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review