Cited by 162Optimal Power Flow DistributionSmart Grid and Power SystemsMicrogrid Control and Optimization

Data-Driven Local Control Design for Active Distribution Grids Using Off-Line Optimal Power Flow and Machine Learning Techniques

Open access
Karagiannopoulos, Stavros, Aristidou, Petros, Hug, Gabriela·2019·IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

Abstract

The optimal control of distribution networks often requires monitoring and communication infrastructure, either centralized or distributed. However, most of the current distribution systems lack this kind of infrastructure and rely on sub-optimal, fit-and-forget, local controls to ensure the security of the network. In this paper, we propose a data-driven algorithm that uses historical data, advanced optimization techniques, and machine learning methods to design local controls that emulate the optimal behavior without the use of any communication. We demonstrate the performance of the optimized local control on a three-phase, unbalanced, low-voltage, distribution network. The results show that our data-driven methodology clearly outperforms standard industry local control and successfully imitates an optimal-power-flow-based control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsg.2019.2905348

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One strategy is to explicitly design local control algorithms; recent work has controlled energy storage and solar inverters using supervised learning techniques trained on historical optimization data.

    “One strategy is to explicitly design local control algorithms; for instance, recent work has controlled energy storage and solar inverters using supervised learning techniques trained on historical optimization data [191,192,410,411].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [410]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karagiannopoulos, S., Aristidou, P., & Hug, G.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Published
2019-11
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
6461-6471
ISSN
  • 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-3061
OpenAlex
W2922251527
Cited by
162
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Ktisis at Cyprus University of Technology (Cyprus University of Technology) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Ktisis at Cyprus University of Technology (Cyprus University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid and Power Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
Keywords
active distribution networks, optimal power flow, data-driven control, machine learning, communication-free control, three-phase distribution systems, distribution network control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review