The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Experimental Investigation of the Tradeoff between Switching Losses and EMI Generation With Hard-Switched All-Si, Si-SiC, and All-SiC Device Combinations
Abstract
Silicon carbide (SiC) switching power devices (MOSFETs, JFETs) of 1200 V rating are now commercially available, and in conjunction with SiC diodes, they offer substantially reduced switching losses relative to silicon (Si) insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) paired with fast-recovery diodes. Low-voltage industrial variable-speed drives are a key application for 1200 V devices, and there is great interest in the replacement of the Si IGBTs and diodes that presently dominate in this application with SiC-based devices. However, much of the performance benefit of SiC-based devices is due to their increased switching speeds ( di/dt, dv/ dt), which raises the issues of increased electromagnetic interference (EMI) generation and detrimental effects on the reliability of inverter-fed electrical machines. In this paper, the tradeoff between switching losses and the high-frequency spectral amplitude of the device switching waveforms is quantified experimentally for all-Si, Si-SiC, and all-SiC device combinations. While exploiting the full switching-speed capability of SiC-based devices results in significantly increased EMI generation, the all-SiC combination provides a 70% reduction in switching losses relative to all-Si when operated at comparable dv/dt. It is also shown that the loss-EMI tradeoff obtained with the Si-SiC device combination can be significantly improved by driving the IGBT with a modified gate voltage profile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Silicon carbide benefits and advantages for power electronics circuits and systems
Elasser, A., & Chow, T. P. (2002) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2002.1021562 · Cited by 537
Cited by
The 2018 GaN power electronics roadmap
Amano, H., Baines, Y., Beam, E., Borga, M., Bouchet, T., Chalker, P. R., Charles, M., Chen, K. J., Chowdhury, N., Chu, R., et al. (2018) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aaaf9d · Cited by 1,313
A Review of SiC Power Module Packaging Technologies: Challenges, Advances, and Emerging Issues
Lee, H., Smet, V., & Tummala, R. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2019.2951801 · Cited by 526
Wide Bandgap Devices in AC Electric Drives: Opportunities and Challenges
Morya, A. K., Gardner, M. C., Anvari, B., Liu, L., Yepes, A. G., Doval-Gandoy, J., & Toliyat, H. A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · doi:10.1109/tte.2019.2892807 · Cited by 444
DC Microgrid Protection: A Comprehensive Review
Beheshtaein, S., Cuzner, R. M., Forouzesh, M., Savaghebi, M., & Guerrero, J. M. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2019.2904588 · Cited by 365
Chang, F., Ilina, O., Lienkamp, M., & Voss, L. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2018.2854756 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Oswald, N., Anthony, P., McNeill, N., & Stark, B. H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2393-2407
- ISSN
- 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0107
- OpenAlex
- W2086397266
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Experimental Investigation of the Tradeoff between Switching Losses and EMI Generation With Hard-Switched All-Si, Si-SiC, and All-SiC Device Combinations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpel.2013.2278919
- The paper
- Oswald, N., Anthony, P., McNeill, N., & Stark, B. H. (2014). An Experimental Investigation of the Tradeoff between Switching Losses and EMI Generation With Hard-Switched All-Si, Si-SiC, and All-SiC Device Combinations. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2013.2278919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.