The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Survey of Wireless Power Transfer and a Critical Comparison of Inductive and Capacitive Coupling for Small Gap Applications
Abstract
Inductive power transfer (IPT) and capacitive power transfer (CPT) are the two most pervasive methods of wireless power transfer (WPT). IPT is the most common and is applicable to many power levels and gap distances. Conversely, CPT is only applicable for power transfer applications with inherently small gap distances due to constraints on the developed voltage. Despite limitations on gap distance, CPT has been shown to be viable in kilowatt power level applications. This paper provides a critical comparison of IPT and CPT for small gap applications, wherein the theoretical and empirical limitations of each approach are established. A survey of empirical WPT data across diverse applications in the last decade using IPT and CPT technology graphically compares the two approaches in power level, gap distance, operational frequency, and efficiency, among other aspects. The coupler volumetric power density constrained to small gap sizes is analytically established through theoretical physical limitations of IPT and CPT. Finally, guidelines for selecting IPT or CPT in small gap systems are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges
Sanguesa, J. A., Torres-Sanz, V., Garrido, P., Martinez, F. J., & Marquez-Barja, J. M. (2021) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities4010022 · Cited by 1,367
A Comprehensive Review of Wireless Charging Technologies for Electric Vehicles
Ahmad, A., Alam, M. S., & Chabaan, R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · doi:10.1109/tte.2017.2771619 · Cited by 993
Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT): Recent Advances and Future Challenges
Ponnimbaduge Perera, T. D., Jayakody, D. N. K., Sharma, S. K., Chatzinotas, S., & Li, J. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2783901 · Cited by 920
A Review on the Recent Development of Capacitive Wireless Power Transfer Technology
Lu, F., Zhang, H., & Mi, C. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10111752 · Cited by 282
BSIS: Blockchain-Based Secure Incentive Scheme for Energy Delivery in Vehicular Energy Network
Wang, Y., Su, Z., & Zhang, N. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2908497 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Dai, J., & Ludois, D. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6017-6029
- ISSN
- 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0107
- OpenAlex
- W2018949661
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Wireless Power Transfer and a Critical Comparison of Inductive and Capacitive Coupling for Small Gap Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpel.2015.2415253
- The paper
- Dai, J., & Ludois, D. C. (2015). A Survey of Wireless Power Transfer and a Critical Comparison of Inductive and Capacitive Coupling for Small Gap Applications. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2015.2415253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.