Cited by 993Wireless Power Transfer SystemsElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

A Comprehensive Review of Wireless Charging Technologies for Electric Vehicles

Ahmad, Aqueel, Alam, Mohammad Saad, Chabaan, Rakan·2018·IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification

Abstract

The profitable commercialization and fast adoption of electrified transportation require fast, economical, and reliable charging infrastructure. This paper provides a comprehensive, state-of-the-art review of all the wireless charging technologies for electric vehicle (EVs), characteristics and standards available in the open literature, as well as sustainable implications and potential safety measures. A comparative overview of conductive charging and wireless charging is followed by a detailed description of static wireless charging, dynamic wireless charging (DWC), and quasi-DWC. Roadblocks, such as coil design of power pads, frequency, power level limitations, misalignment, and potential solutions, are outlined. The standards are then tabulated to deliver a coherent view of the current status, followed by an explanation of the crux of these standards. Necessity and progress in the standardization of wireless charging systems are then deliberated. Vehicle-to-grid application of wireless charging is reviewed followed by an overview of economic analysis, social implications, the effect on sustainability, and safety aspects to evaluate the commercial feasibility of wireless charging. This paper will be highly beneficial to research entities, industry professionals, and investment representatives as a ready reference of the wireless charging system of EVs, with information on important characteristics and standards.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tte.2017.2771619

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WPT for charging has the potential of being more reliable under extreme weather conditions and of offering a lower environmental impact and more safety benefits than conventional wired charging systems.

    “WPT for charging has the potential of being more reliable under extreme weather conditions and of offering a lower environmental impact and more safety benefits than conventional wired charging systems [16]; however, WPT has some technical issues that include the imperfect”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, A., Alam, M. S., & Chabaan, R.
Affiliations
Aligarh Muslim University (IN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification
Published
2018-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
38-63
ISSN
  • 2332-7782 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2088
OpenAlex
W2767746168
Cited by
993
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 168 · 2022: 158 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 2
FWCI
22.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification (publishedVersion)
Funders
Government of India, Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises, Department of Heavy Industries (DHI), Project Implementation and Sanctioning Committee (PISC), under the FAME-India Scheme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
wireless charging, electric vehicles, dynamic wireless charging, charging standards, vehicle-to-grid, charging infrastructure, charging safety, sustainability, economic analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review