Cited by 211Advanced DC-DC ConvertersWireless Power Transfer SystemsElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression

High-Frequency PCB Winding Transformer with Integrated Inductors for a Bi-Directional Resonant Converter

Li, Bin, Li, Qiang, Lee, Fred C.·2019·IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

Abstract

The momentum toward high power density high-efficiency power converters continues unabated. The key to reducing the size of power converters is high-frequency operation and the bottleneck is the magnetic components. With the emerging widebandgap devices, the switching frequency of power converters increases significantly, to hundreds of kilohertz, which provides us the opportunity to adopt printed circuit board (PCB) winding planar magnetics. Compared with the conventional litz-wire-based magnetics, planar magnetics can not only effectively reduce the converter size, but also offer improved reliability through automated manufacturing process with repeatable parasitics. Another way to reduce the number of magnetic components and shrink the size of power converters is through the magnetic integration. In this paper, a novel PCB winding based magnetic structure is proposed to integrate both inductor and transformer into one component. In this structure, the inductor value can be easily controlled by changing the cross-sectional area of the core or the length of the air gap. A 6.6-kW 500-kHz CLLC resonant converter prototype with 98% efficiency and 130-W/in3(8 kW/L) power density is built to verify the feasibility of the proposed PCB winding based magnetic structure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpel.2018.2874806

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, B., Li, Q., & Lee, F. C.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Published
2019-07
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
6123-6135
ISSN
  • 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0107
OpenAlex
W2895839248
Cited by
211
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  • High-Efficiency High-Density GaN-Based 6.6-kW Bi-Directional On-Board Charger for PEVs
  • Delta Products Corp (DE-EE0006834)
  • Power Management Consortium with the Center for Power Electronics Systems
  • Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Keywords
planar magnetics, CLLC resonant converter, magnetic integration, high-frequency converters, power density, air gap control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review