The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bactericidal Action of the Reactive Species Produced by Gas-Discharge Nonthermal Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure: A Review
Abstract
Biological decontamination using a nonthermal gas discharge at atmospheric pressure in air is the subject of significant research effort at this time. The mechanism for bacterial deactivation undergoes a lot of speculation, particularly with regard to the role of ions and reactive gas species. Two mechanisms have been proposed: electrostatic disruption of cell membranes and lethal oxidation of membrane or cytoplasmic components. Results show that death is accompanied by cell lysis and fragmentation in Gram-negative bacteria but not Gram-positive species, although cytoplasmic leakage is generally observed. Gas discharges can be a source of charged particles, ions, reactive gas species, radicals, and radiation (ultraviolet, infrared, and visible), many of which have documented biocidal properties. The individual roles played by these in decontamination are not well understood or quantified. However, the reactions of some species with biomolecules are documented otherwise in the literature. Oxidative stress is relatively well studied, and it is likely that exposure to gas discharges in air causes extreme oxidative challenge. In this paper, a review is presented of the major reactive species generated by nonthermal plasma at atmospheric pressure and the known reactions of these with biological molecules. Understanding these mechanisms becomes increasingly important as plasma-based decontamination and sterilization devices come closer to a wide-scale application in medical, healthcare, food processing, and air purification applications. Approaches are proposed to elucidate the relative importance of reactive species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Halliwell, B., & Whiteman, M. (2004) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705776 · Cited by 2,238
Cited by
von Woedtke, T., Reuter, S., Masur, K., & Weltmann, K.-D. (2013) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.005 · Cited by 848
Han, L., Patil, S., Boehm, D., Milosavljević, V., Cullen, P. J., & Bourke, P. (2016) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02660-15 · Cited by 435
Atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) as a new powerful mutagenesis tool
Zhang, X., Zhang, X.-F., Li, H.-P., Wang, L.-Y., Zhang, C., Xing, X.-H., & Bao, C.-Y. (2014) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-014-5755-y · Cited by 381
Potential cellular targets and antibacterial efficacy of atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma
Alkawareek, M. Y., Gorman, S. P., Graham, W. G., & Gilmore, B. F. (2014) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.08.022 · Cited by 185
Mahnot, N. K., Mahanta, C. L., Keener, K. M., & Misra, N. N. (2019) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.084 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaunt, L. F., Beggs, C. B., & Georghiou, G. E.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1257-1269
- ISSN
- 0093-3813 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101791477
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bactericidal Action of the Reactive Species Produced by Gas-Discharge Nonthermal Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tps.2006.878381
- The paper
- Gaunt, L. F., Beggs, C. B., & Georghiou, G. E. (2006). Bactericidal Action of the Reactive Species Produced by Gas-Discharge Nonthermal Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure: A Review. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2006.878381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.