The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zero Duality Gap in Optimal Power Flow Problem
Abstract
The optimal power flow (OPF) problem is nonconvex and generally hard to solve. In this paper, we propose a semidefinite programming (SDP) optimization, which is the dual of an equivalent form of the OPF problem. A global optimum solution to the OPF problem can be retrieved from a solution of this convex dual problem whenever the duality gap is zero. A necessary and sufficient condition is provided in this paper to guarantee the existence of no duality gap for the OPF problem. This condition is satisfied by the standard IEEE benchmark systems with 14, 30, 57, 118, and 300 buses as well as several randomly generated systems. Since this condition is hard to study, a sufficient zero-duality-gap condition is also derived. This sufficient condition holds for IEEE systems after small resistance (10-5per unit) is added to every transformer that originally assumes zero resistance. We investigate this sufficient condition and justify that it holds widely in practice. The main underlying reason for the successful convexification of the OPF problem can be traced back to the modeling of transformers and transmission lines as well as the non-negativity of physical quantities such as resistance and inductance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Cited by
Branch Flow Model: Relaxations and Convexification—Part I
Farivar, M., & Low, S. H. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2013.2255317 · Cited by 1,541
Self-citationAC-feasibility on tree networks is NP-hard
Lehmann, K., Grastien, A., & Van Hentenryck, P. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2407363 · Cited by 221
Karagiannopoulos, S., Aristidou, P., & Hug, G. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2019.2905348 · Cited by 162
Toward Distributed Energy Services: Decentralizing Optimal Power Flow With Machine Learning
Dobbe, R., Sondermeijer, O., Fridovich-Keil, D., Arnold, D., Callaway, D., & Tomlin, C. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2019.2935711 · Cited by 120
Geometry of injection regions of power networks
Zhang, B., & Tse, D. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2208205 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Lavaei, J., & Low, S. H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-107
- ISSN
- 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0679
- OpenAlex
- W2141380252
- Cited by
- 1,195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zero Duality Gap in Optimal Power Flow Problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2160974
- The paper
- Lavaei, J., & Low, S. H. (2012). Zero Duality Gap in Optimal Power Flow Problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2160974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.