The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geometrically Constrained Trajectory Optimization for Multicopters
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we present an optimization-based framework for multicopter trajectory planning subject to geometrical configuration constraints and user-defined dynamic constraints. The basis of the framework is a novel trajectory representation built upon our novel optimality conditions for unconstrained control effort minimization. We design linear-complexity operations on this representation to conduct spatial–temporal deformation under various planning requirements. Smooth maps are utilized to exactly eliminate geometrical constraints in a lightweight fashion. A variety of state-input constraints are supported by the decoupling of dense constraint evaluation from sparse parameterization and the backward differentiation of flatness map. As a result, this framework transforms a generally constrained multicopter planning problem into an unconstrained optimization that can be solved reliably and efficiently. Our framework bridges the gaps among solution quality, planning efficiency, and constraint fidelity for a multicopter with limited resources and maneuvering capability. Its generality and robustness are both demonstrated by applications to different flight tasks. Extensive simulations and benchmarks are also conducted to show its capability of generating high-quality solutions while retaining the computation speed against other specialized methods by orders of magnitude.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
Bertsekas, D. P. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1038/sj.jors.2600425 · Cited by 11,726
(1995) · Cited by 10,558
Wächter, A., & Biegler, L. T. (2006) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y · Cited by 9,483
(2006) · Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5 · Cited by 9,008
On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization
Liu, D. C., & Nocedal, J. (1989) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf01589116 · Cited by 8,560
Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces
Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., & Overmars, M. H. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/70.508439 · Cited by 6,343 · cited 3×
“The Probabilistic Roadmap (PRM) [16] and the Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) [17] are both probabilistically complete since their probability of failure decays to zero exponentially as the sample number goes to infinity [18].”
BackgroundThe quickhull algorithm for convex hulls
Barber, C. B., Dobkin, D. P., & Huhdanpaa, H. (1996) · ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · doi:10.1145/235815.235821 · Cited by 5,359
Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning
Karaman, S., & Frazzoli, E. (2011) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364911406761 · Cited by 5,275
Cited by
Swarm of micro flying robots in the wild
Zhou, X., Wen, X., Wang, Z., Gao, Y., Li, H., Wang, Q., Yang, T., Lu, H., Cao, Y., Xu, C., et al. (2022) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abm5954 · Cited by 657
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Zhou, X., Xu, C., & Gao, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3259-3278
- ISSN
- 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0468
- OpenAlex
- W3135798748
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 26.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geometrically Constrained Trajectory Optimization for Multicopters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tro.2022.3160022
- The paper
- Wang, Z., Zhou, X., Xu, C., & Gao, F. (2022). Geometrically Constrained Trajectory Optimization for Multicopters. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2022.3160022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.