The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimentation in software engineering
Abstract
A framework is presented for analyzing most of the experimental work performed in software engineering over the past several years. The framework of experimentation consists of four categories corresponding to phases of the experimentation process: definition, planning, operation, and interpretation. A variety of experiments are described within the framework and their contribution to the software engineering discipline is discussed. Some recommendations for the application of the experimental process in software engineering are included.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering
Runeson, P., & Höst, M. (2009) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8 · Cited by 3,862
A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods
Kjeldskov, J., & Graham, C. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45233-1_23 · Cited by 375
Fenton, N. E., & Neil, M. (2000) · Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/336512.336588 · Cited by 317
(2015) · doi:10.1007/s10664-013-9279-3 · Cited by 273
The ABC of Software Engineering Research
Stol, K.-J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3241743 · Cited by 245
Replicating software engineering experiments: a poisoned chalice or the Holy Grail
Miller, J. (2005) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2004.08.005 · Cited by 84
The role and value of replication in empirical software engineering results
Shepperd, M., Ajienka, N., & Counsell, S. (2018) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.01.006 · Cited by 60
Developers' code context models for change tasks
Fritz, T., Shepherd, D. C., Kevic, K., Snipes, W., & Bräunlich, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2635868.2635905 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Basili, V. R., Selby, R. W., & Hutchens, D. H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 1986-07
- Volume
- SE-12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 733-743
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2172287543
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
