Cited by 45Software Engineering ResearchSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesWeb Applications and Data Management

Developers' code context models for change tasks

Open access
Fritz, Thomas, Shepherd, David C., Kevic, Katja, Snipes, Will, Bräunlich, Christoph·2014·Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering

Abstract

To complete a change task, software developers spend a substantial amount of time navigating code to understand the relevant parts. During this investigation phase, they implicitly build context models of the elements and relations that are relevant to the task. Through an exploratory study with twelve developers completing change tasks in three open source systems, we identified important characteristics of these context models and how they are created. In a second empirical analysis, we further examined our findings on data collected from eighty developers working on a variety of change tasks on open and closed source projects. Our studies uncovered, amongst other results, that code context models are highly connected, structurally and lexically, that developers start tasks using a combination of search and navigation and that code navigation varies substantially across developers. Based on these findings we identify and discuss design requirements to better support developers in the initial creation of code context models. We believe this work represents a substantial step in better understanding developers' code navigation and providing better tool support that will reduce time and effort needed for change tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2635868.2635905

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fritz, T., Shepherd, D. C., Kevic, K., Snipes, W., & Bräunlich, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • ABB (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-11-11
Pages
7-18
OpenAlex
W1978334736
Cited by
45
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
Keywords
code navigation, developer behavior, code search, open source software, program comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review