Cited by 420Smart Grid Energy ManagementElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureIoT-based Smart Home Systems

A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning-Based Data-Driven Method for Home Energy Management

Open access
Xu, Xu, Jia, Youwei, Xu, Yan, Xu, Zhao, Chai, Songjian, Lai, Chun Sing·2020·IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel framework for home energy management (HEM) based on reinforcement learning in achieving efficient home-based demand response (DR). The concerned hour-ahead energy consumption scheduling problem is duly formulated as a finite Markov decision process (FMDP) with discrete time steps. To tackle this problem, a data-driven method based on neural network (NN) and Q-learning algorithm is developed, which achieves superior performance on cost-effective schedules for HEM system. Specifically, real data of electricity price and solar photovoltaic (PV) generation are timely processed for uncertainty prediction by extreme learning machine (ELM) in the rolling time windows. The scheduling decisions of the household appliances and electric vehicles (EVs) can be subsequently obtained through the newly developed framework, of which the objective is dual, i.e., to minimize the electricity bill as well as the DR induced dissatisfaction. Simulations are performed on a residential house level with multiple home appliances, an EV and several PV panels. The test results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed data-driven based HEM framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsg.2020.2971427

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fuzzy Q-learning adaptations allow agents to navigate uncertain partner behaviors or incomplete operational data by adjusting policy confidence based on interaction outcomes.

    “When paired with fuzzy Q-learning adaptations [43], agents can navigate uncertain partner behaviors or incomplete operational data by adjusting policy confidence based on interaction outcomes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, X., Jia, Y., Xu, Y., Xu, Z., Chai, S., & Lai, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Published
2020-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
3201-3211
ISSN
  • 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-3061
OpenAlex
W3005335721
Cited by
420
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 21
FWCI
19.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • SUSTech Faculty Startup Funding (Y01236135, Y01236235)
  • Young Talent Program (2018KQNCX223)
  • Nanyang Assistant Professorship from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT-based Smart Home Systems
Keywords
home energy management systems, demand response, multi-agent reinforcement learning, Q-learning, finite Markov decision processes, extreme learning machine, uncertainty prediction, solar photovoltaic generation, electric vehicle scheduling, home appliance scheduling, electricity price forecasting, cost minimization, user dissatisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review