Cited by 460Electric Power System OptimizationSmart Grid Energy ManagementReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Reinforcement Learning and Its Applications in Modern Power and Energy Systems: A Review

Open access
Cao, Di, Hu, Weihao, Zhao, Junbo, Zhang, Guozhou, Zhang, Bin, Liu, Zhou, Chen, Zhe, Blaabjerg, Frede·2020·Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy

Abstract

With the growing integration of distributed energy resources (DERs), flexible loads, and other emerging technologies, there are increasing complexities and uncertainties for modern power and energy systems. This brings great challenges to the operation and control. Besides, with the deployment of advanced sensor and smart meters, a large number of data are generated, which brings opportunities for novel data-driven methods to deal with complicated operation and control issues. Among them, reinforcement learning (RL) is one of the most widely promoted methods for control and optimization problems. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of RL in terms of basic ideas, various types of algorithms, and their applications in power and energy systems. The challenges and further works are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35833/mpce.2020.000552

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The surge in workload and operational responsibilities strains existing EMSs, making targeted processing during power system operation, particularly during fault states, challenging.

    “This surge in workload and operational responsibilities strains the existing energy management systems (EMSs), typically numerical analysis software, making targeted processing during power system operation, particularly during fault states, challenging [4].”

    From A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Power System Stability, Control, and Protection: Insights and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says growing complexity and uncertainty create challenges for operating power and energy systems, and the IES Management section says coordinating energy supply makes management challenging. Neither passage says increased workload strains existing EMS software or makes targeted processing difficult during fault states. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [12]12. S. Das and I. Pan, "On the mixed H ∞ /H 2 loop-shaping tradeoffs in frac- tional-order control of the AVR system," IEEE Transactions on Indus- trial Informatics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1982-1991, Nov. 2013.
  2. [22]22. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. Cam- bridge: MIT Press, 2016.
  3. [23]23. R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: an Introduc- tion. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.
  4. [30]30. D. Silver, G. Lever, N. Heess et al., "Deterministic policy gradient al- gorithms," in Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, Beijing, China, Jun. 2014, pp. 387-395.
  5. [33]33. J. Schulman, S. Levine, P. Abbeel et al., "Trust region policy optimiza- tion," in Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, Lille, France, Jul. 2015, pp. 1889-1897.
  6. [34]34. J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal et al. (2017, Jul.). Proximal poli- cy optimization algorithms. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv. org/abs/ 1707.06347
  7. [36]36. J. N. Foerster, N. Nardelli, G. Farquhar et al., "Stabilizing experience replay for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning," in Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, Sydney, Australia, Aug. 2017, pp. 1-10.
  8. [47]47. Z. Yan and Y. Xu, "Real-time optimal power flow: a Lagrangian based deep reinforcement learning approach," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 3270-3273, Apr. 2020.
  9. [62]62. G. P. Henze and S. Liu, "Experimental analysis of simulated reinforce- ment learning control for active and passive building thermal storage inventory-part 1: theoretical foundation." Energy and Buildings, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 142-147, Feb. 2006.
  10. [63]63. G. P. Henze and S. Liu, "Experimental analysis of simulated reinforce- ment learning control for active and passive building thermal storage inventory -part 2: results and analysis," Energy and Buildings, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 148-161, Feb. 2006.
  11. [88]88. A. C. Tellidou and A. G. Bakirtzis, "Agent-based analysis of capacity with holding and tacit collusion in electricity markets," IEEE Transac- tions on Power Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1735-1742, Dec. 2007.
  12. [94]94. T. Yu, B. Zhou, K. W. Chan et al., "Stochastic optimal relaxed auto- matic generation control in non-Markov environment based on multi- step Q(λ) learning," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1272 -1282, Aug. 2011.
  13. [110]110. Z. Yan and Y. Xu, "A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning method for cooperative load frequency control of multi-area power systems," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 4599-4608, Nov. 2020.
  14. [113]113. D. Cao, J. Zhao, W. Hu et al. (2020, May). Distributed voltage regula- tion of active distribution system based on enhanced multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv. org/abs/ 2006.00546

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, D., Hu, W., Zhao, J., Zhang, G., Zhang, B., Liu, Z., Chen, Z., & Blaabjerg, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Mississippi State University (US)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
Venue
Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy
Published
2020
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
1029-1042
ISSN
  • 2196-5420 (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-5625
OpenAlex
W3108288031
Cited by
460
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 1
FWCI
15.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
reinforcement learning, power system operation, energy system control, distributed energy resources, flexible loads, data-driven control, smart meters, power system optimization, power system uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review