The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grid: A Secure Federated Deep Learning Approach
Open accessAbstract
As an important cyber-physical system (CPS), smart grid is highly vulnerable to cyber attacks. Amongst various types of attacks, false data injection attack (FDIA) proves to be one of the top-priority cyber-related issues and has received increasing attention in recent years. However, so far little attention has been paid to privacy preservation issues in the detection of FDIAs in smart grids. Inspired by federated learning, a FDIA detection method based on secure federated deep learning is proposed in this paper by combining Transformer, federated learning and Paillier cryptosystem. The Transformer, as a detector deployed in edge nodes, delves deep into the connection between individual electrical quantities by using its multi-head self-attention mechanism. By using federated learning framework, our approach utilizes the data from all nodes to collaboratively train a detection model while preserving data privacy by keeping the data locally during training. To improve the security of federated learning, a secure federated learning scheme is designed by combing Paillier cryptosystem with federated learning. Through extensive experiments on the IEEE 14-bus and 118-bus test systems, the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method are verified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes
Paillier, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48910-x_16 · Cited by 7,250
Detecting False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grids: A Semi-Supervised Deep Learning Approach
Zhang, Y., Wang, J., & Chen, B. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2020.3010510 · Cited by 332
Experience-Driven Attack Design and Federated-Learning-Based Intrusion Detection in Industry 4.0
Tahir, B., Jolfaei, A., & Tariq, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3133384 · Cited by 47
Cited by
Anomaly detection for a water treatment system based on one-class neural network
Aboah Boateng, E., Bruce, J. W., & Talbert, D. A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3218624 · Cited by 44
On the Convergence of Decentralized Federated Learning Under Imperfect Information Sharing
Chellapandi, V. P., Upadhyay, A., Hashemi, A., & Żak, S. H. (2023) · IEEE Control Systems Letters · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2023.3290470 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Wei, X., Li, Y., Dong, Z., & Shahidehpour, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4862-4872
- ISSN
- 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-3061
- OpenAlex
- W4294811472
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grid: A Secure Federated Deep Learning Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsg.2022.3204796
- The paper
- Li, Y., Wei, X., Li, Y., Dong, Z., & Shahidehpour, M. (2022). Detection of False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grid: A Secure Federated Deep Learning Approach. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2022.3204796
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.