The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Complex Systems Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps
Abstract
This research deals with the soft computing methodology of fuzzy cognitive map (FCM). Here a mathematical description of FCM is presented and a new methodology based on fuzzy logic techniques for developing the FCM is examined. The capability and usefulness of FCM in modeling complex systems and the application of FCM to modeling and describing the behavior of a heat exchanger system is presented. The applicability of FCM to model the supervisor of complex systems is discussed and the FCM-supervisor for evaluating the performance of a system is constructed; simulation results are presented and discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kosko, B. (1986) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(86)80040-2 · Cited by 3,576
Cited by
A Review of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Research During the Last Decade
Papageorgiou, E. I., & Salmeron, J. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2012.2201727 · Cited by 522
The 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
(2016) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2016.2545826 · Cited by 308
Papageorgiou, E. I., Markinos, A. T., & Gemtos, T. A. (2011) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.01.036 · Cited by 157
Big data-driven fuzzy cognitive map for prioritising IT service procurement in the public sector
Choi, Y., Lee, H., & Irani, Z. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2281-6 · Cited by 76
Chiang, D. F., Guerrero, S. A., Sexton, E. C., & Gardner, S. S. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05292-7 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Stylios, C. D., & Groumpos, P. P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-162
- ISSN
- 1083-4427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127025275
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
