CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 773

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The CAS-PEAL Large-Scale Chinese Face Database and Baseline Evaluations

Wen Gao, Bo Cao, Shiguang Shan, Xilin Chen, Delong Zhou, Xiaohua Zhang, Debin Zhao·2008·IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans
DOI 10.1109/tsmca.2007.909557
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the acquisition and contents of a large-scale Chinese face database: the CAS-PEAL face database. The goals of creating the CAS-PEAL face database include the following: 1) providing the worldwide researchers of face recognition with different sources of variations, particularly pose, expression, accessories, and lighting (PEAL), and exhaustive ground-truth information in one uniform database; 2) advancing the state-of-the-art face recognition technologies aiming at practical applications by using off-the-shelf imaging equipment and by designing normal face variations in the database; and 3) providing a large-scale face database of Mongolian. Currently, the CAS-PEAL face database contains 99 594 images of 1040 individuals (595 males and 445 females). A total of nine cameras are mounted horizontally on an arc arm to simultaneously capture images across different poses. Each subject is asked to look straight ahead, up, and down to obtain 27 images in three shots. Five facial expressions, six accessories, and 15 lighting changes are also included in the database. A selected subset of the database (CAS-PEAL-R1, containing 30 863 images of the 1040 subjects) is available to other researchers now. We discuss the evaluation protocol based on the CAS-PEAL-R1 database and present the performance of four algorithms as a baseline to do the following: 1) elementarily assess the difficulty of the database for face recognition algorithms; 2) preference evaluation…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsmca.2007.909557

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The FISWG feature list includes 18 facial components, each with associated descriptors, as well as a nineteenth descriptive component for use with uncategorized features.

    “This list includes 18 facial components, each with associated descriptors, as well as a nineteenth descriptive component for use with uncategorized features [51,54].”

    From Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions (2021) · cites this paper as [54]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1109/12.210173 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1039204 · DOI
  3. ahonen, 2004, face recognition with local binary patterns, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis, 1, 469
  4. 10.1109/ICIP.2003.1247052 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/34.598235 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1265861 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/34.908964 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/34.598229 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/AMFG.2003.1240838 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/AFGR.2004.1301550 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/ICCV.2005.147 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.57 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/954339.954342 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/34.982883 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0146167289151002 · DOI
  16. lu, 2004, ethnicity identification from face images, Proc SPIEDefense and Security Symp, 5404, 114
  17. 10.1207/s15516709cog2606_4 · DOI
  18. 10.1364/JOSAA.14.001724 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/34.531802 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/ICPR.2004.1334121 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TIP.2002.999679 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/CVPR.2005.150 · DOI
  23. martinez, 1998, The AR face database
  24. messer, 1999, xm2vtsdb: the extended m2vts database, Proc Int Conf Audio Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, 72
  25. 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1008382 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/ACV.1994.341300 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/978-3-642-72201-1_25 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/CVPR.1991.139758 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/34.598228 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/34.927464 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.92 · DOI
  32. bailliere, 2003, the banca database and evaluation protocol, Proc Int Conf Audio Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, 625, 10.1007/3-540-44887-X_74 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/0-387-27257-7_14 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0262-8856(97)00070-X · DOI
  35. 10.1109/5.381842 · DOI
  36. blackburn, 2001, Face recognition vendor test 2000 Evaluation report, 10.21236/ADA415962 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/34.879790 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1109/CVPR.2005.268 · DOI
  39. phillips, 2003, Face recognition vendor test 2002 Evaluation report, 10.6028/NIST.IR.6965 · DOI
  40. 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1227983 · DOI
  41. 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1251154 · DOI
  42. 10.1109/TNN.2005.849817 · DOI
  43. 10.1109/ICPR.2002.1047791 · DOI
  44. 10.1109/34.598230 · DOI
  45. 10.1109/CVPR.1994.323893 · DOI
  46. edwards, 1998, face recognition using active appearance models, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis, 2, 581
  47. beymer, 1996, image representations for visual learning, Science, 272, 1905, 10.1126/science.272.5270.1905 · DOI
  48. 10.1109/CVPR.1997.609431 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00079-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gao, W., Cao, B., Shan, S., Chen, X., Zhou, D., Zhang, X., & Zhao, D.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2008-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
149-161
ISSN
1083-4427
DOI
10.1109/tsmca.2007.909557
Cited by
773
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review