Cited by 580Face recognition and analysisEmotion and Mood RecognitionFace and Expression Recognition

Dynamics of facial expression: recognition of facial actions and their temporal segments from face profile image sequences

Open access
Pantic, M., Patras, I.·2006·IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)

Abstract

Automatic analysis of human facial expression is a challenging problem with many applications. Most of the existing automated systems for facial expression analysis attempt to recognize a few prototypic emotional expressions, such as anger and happiness. Instead of representing another approach to machine analysis of prototypic facial expressions of emotion, the method presented in this paper attempts to handle a large range of human facial behavior by recognizing facial muscle actions that produce expressions. Virtually all of the existing vision systems for facial muscle action detection deal only with frontal-view face images and cannot handle temporal dynamics of facial actions. In this paper, we present a system for automatic recognition of facial action units (AUs) and their temporal models from long, profile-view face image sequences. We exploit particle filtering to track 15 facial points in an input face-profile sequence, and we introduce facial-action-dynamics recognition from continuous video input using temporal rules. The algorithm performs both automatic segmentation of an input video into facial expressions pictured and recognition of temporal segments (i.e., onset, apex, offset) of 27 AUs occurring alone or in a combination in the input face-profile video. A recognition rate of 87% is achieved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsmcb.2005.859075

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pantic, M., & Patras, I.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)
Published
2006-04
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
433-449
ISSN
1083-4419 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110885456
Cited by
580
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 42
FWCI
35.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial expression analysis, facial action units, particle filter, temporal rules
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Face, Facial Expression, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Movement, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Photography, Sensitivity and Specificity, Subtraction Technique, Time Factors, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Cluster Analysis, Information Storage and Retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review