Meta-Analysis of the First Facial Expression Recognition Challenge
Open accessAbstract
Automatic facial expression recognition has been an active topic in computer science for over two decades, in particular facial action coding system action unit (AU) detection and classification of a number of discrete emotion states from facial expressive imagery. Standardization and comparability have received some attention; for instance, there exist a number of commonly used facial expression databases. However, lack of a commonly accepted evaluation protocol and, typically, lack of sufficient details needed to reproduce the reported individual results make it difficult to compare systems. This, in turn, hinders the progress of the field. A periodical challenge in facial expression recognition would allow such a comparison on a level playing field. It would provide an insight on how far the field has come and would allow researchers to identify new goals, challenges, and targets. This paper presents a meta-analysis of the first such challenge in automatic recognition of facial expressions, held during the IEEE conference on Face and Gesture Recognition 2011. It details the challenge data, evaluation protocol, and the results attained in two subchallenges: AU detection and classification of facial expression imagery in terms of a number of discrete emotion categories. We also summarize the lessons learned and reflect on the future of the field of facial expression recognition in general and on possible future challenges in particular.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The FERA challenge added a special section for intensity estimation.
“As a consequence the Facial Expression and Recognition (FERA) challenge added a special section for intensity estimation [231], [232].”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [231]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns
Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., & Maenpaa, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017623 · Cited by 15,398 · see citing works
An argument for basic emotions
Ekman, P. (1992) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 · Cited by 9,646 · see citing works
The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding
EKMAN, P., & FRIESEN, W. V. (1969) · Semiotica · doi:10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49 · Cited by 3,316 · see citing works
Automatic analysis of facial expressions: the state of the art
Pantie, M., & Rothkrantz, L. J. M. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.895976 · Cited by 1,778 · see citing works
Recognizing action units for facial expression analysis
Tian, Y.-I., Kanade, T., & Cohn, J. F. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.908962 · Cited by 1,745 · see citing works
The painful face – Pain expression recognition using active appearance models
Ashraf, A. B., Lucey, S., Cohn, J. F., Chen, T., Ambadar, Z., Prkachin, K. M., & Solomon, P. E. (2009) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2009.05.007 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Zhi, R., Flierl, M., Ruan, Q., & Kleijn, W. B. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2010.2044788 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotion recognition using multi-modal data and machine learning techniques: A tutorial and review
Zhang, J., Yin, Z., Chen, P., & Nichele, S. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.011 · Cited by 806 · see citing works
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Video and Image based Emotion Recognition Challenges in the Wild: EmotiW 2015
Dhall, A., Ramana Murthy, O. V., Goecke, R., Joshi, J., & Gedeon, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction · doi:10.1145/2818346.2829994 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
AFEW-VA database for valence and arousal estimation in-the-wild
Kossaifi, J., Tzimiropoulos, G., Todorovic, S., & Pantic, M. (2017) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2017.02.001 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Self-citationFacial Expression Recognition: A Survey
Huang, Y., Chen, F., Lv, S., & Wang, X. (2019) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym11101189 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
- Authors
- Valstar, M. F., Mehu, M., Jiang, B., Pantic, M., & Scherer, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 966-979
- ISSN
- 1083-4419 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0492
- OpenAlex
- W1975436731
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (51NF40-104897)
- European Commission (231287)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (104897, 203143, 101411, 100367, 51NF40)
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Université de Genève (51NF40-104897)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/H016988/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Keywords
- facial expression recognition, facial action units, action unit detection, emotion classification, facial expression database, evaluation protocol, benchmark challenge, reproducibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review