Cited by 305Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace and Expression RecognitionFace recognition and analysis

Video and Image based Emotion Recognition Challenges in the Wild: EmotiW 2015

Dhall, Abhinav, Ramana Murthy, O.V., Goecke, Roland, Joshi, Jyoti, Gedeon, Tom·2015·Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Abstract

The third Emotion Recognition in the Wild (EmotiW) challenge 2015 consists of an audio-video based emotion and static image based facial expression classification sub-challenges, which mimics real-world conditions. The two sub-challenges are based on the Acted Facial Expression in the Wild (AFEW) 5.0 and the Static Facial Expression in the Wild (SFEW) 2.0 databases, respectively. The paper describes the data, baseline method, challenge protocol and the challenge results. A total of 12 and 17 teams participated in the video based emotion and image based expression sub-challenges, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2818346.2829994

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhall, A., Ramana Murthy, O. V., Goecke, R., Joshi, J., & Gedeon, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-11-09
Pages
423-426
OpenAlex
W2243226955
Cited by
305
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 12
FWCI
52.06
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
facial expression recognition, baseline method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review