Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning Algorithms for Fuzzy Cognitive Maps—A Review Study

Open access
Papageorgiou, Elpiniki I.·2012·IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)

Abstract

This study presents a survey on the most recent learning approaches and algorithms that are related to fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs). FCMs are cognition fuzzy influence graphs, which are based on fuzzy logic and neural network aspects that inherit their main advantages. They gained momentum due to their dynamic characteristics and learning capabilities. These capabilities make them essential for modeling and decision-making tasks as they improve the performance of these tasks. An efficient number of learning algorithms for FCMs, by modifying the FCM weight matrix, have been developed in order to update the initial knowledge of human experts and/or include any knowledge from historical data in order to produce learned weights. The proposed learning techniques have mainly been concentrated on three directions: on the production of weight matrices on the basis of historical data, on adaptation of the cause-effect relationships of the FCM on the basis of experts' intervention, and on the production of weight matrices by combining experts' knowledge and data. The learning techniques could be categorized into three groups on the basis of the learning paradigm: Hebbian-based, population-based, and hybrid, which subsequently combine the main aspects of Hebbian-based- and population-based-type learning algorithms. These types of learning algorithms are the most efficient and widely used to train the FCMs, according to the existing literature. A survey on recent advances on learning methodologies and algorithms for FCMs that present their dynamic capabilities and application characteristics in diverse scientific fields is established here.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2138694

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Papageorgiou, E. I.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)
Published
2012-03
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
150-163
ISSN
  • 1094-6977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2442
OpenAlex
W2081232506
Cited by
322
References
1
FWCI
16.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Algorithms for Fuzzy Cognitive Maps—A Review Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2138694
The paper
Papageorgiou, E. I. (2012). Learning Algorithms for Fuzzy Cognitive Maps—A Review Study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2138694

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.