The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Algorithms for Fuzzy Cognitive Maps—A Review Study
Open accessAbstract
This study presents a survey on the most recent learning approaches and algorithms that are related to fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs). FCMs are cognition fuzzy influence graphs, which are based on fuzzy logic and neural network aspects that inherit their main advantages. They gained momentum due to their dynamic characteristics and learning capabilities. These capabilities make them essential for modeling and decision-making tasks as they improve the performance of these tasks. An efficient number of learning algorithms for FCMs, by modifying the FCM weight matrix, have been developed in order to update the initial knowledge of human experts and/or include any knowledge from historical data in order to produce learned weights. The proposed learning techniques have mainly been concentrated on three directions: on the production of weight matrices on the basis of historical data, on adaptation of the cause-effect relationships of the FCM on the basis of experts' intervention, and on the production of weight matrices by combining experts' knowledge and data. The learning techniques could be categorized into three groups on the basis of the learning paradigm: Hebbian-based, population-based, and hybrid, which subsequently combine the main aspects of Hebbian-based- and population-based-type learning algorithms. These types of learning algorithms are the most efficient and widely used to train the FCMs, according to the existing literature. A survey on recent advances on learning methodologies and algorithms for FCMs that present their dynamic capabilities and application characteristics in diverse scientific fields is established here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kosko, B. (1986) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(86)80040-2 · Cited by 3,576
Cited by
A Review of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Research During the Last Decade
Papageorgiou, E. I., & Salmeron, J. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2012.2201727 · Cited by 522
Self-citationAssessing impacts and community preparedness to cyclones: a fuzzy cognitive mapping approach
Singh, P. K., & Chudasama, H. (2017) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-017-2007-z · Cited by 51
Mkhitaryan, S., Giabbanelli, P. J., de Vries, N. K., & Crutzen, R. (2020) · Intelligence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ibmed.2020.100008 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Papageorgiou, E. I.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 150-163
- ISSN
- 1094-6977 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2442
- OpenAlex
- W2081232506
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Algorithms for Fuzzy Cognitive Maps—A Review Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2138694
- The paper
- Papageorgiou, E. I. (2012). Learning Algorithms for Fuzzy Cognitive Maps—A Review Study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2138694
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.