The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Broadcast Gossip Algorithms for Consensus
Abstract
Motivated by applications to wireless sensor, peer-to-peer, and ad hoc networks, we study distributed broadcasting algorithms for exchanging information and computing in an arbitrarily connected network of nodes. Specifically, we study a broadcasting-based gossiping algorithm to compute the (possibly weighted) average of the initial measurements of the nodes at every node in the network. We show that thebroadcastgossipalgorithmconverges almost surely to a consensus. We prove that the random consensus value is, in expectation, the average of initial node measurements and that it can be made arbitrarily close to this value in mean squared error sense, under a balanced connectivity model and by trading off convergence speed with accuracy of the computation. We provide theoretical and numerical results on the mean square error performance, on the convergence rate and study the effect of the ldquomixing parameterrdquo on the convergence rate of the broadcast gossip algorithm. The results indicate that the mean squared error strictly decreases through iterations until the consensus is achieved. Finally, we assess and compare the communication cost of the broadcast gossip algorithm to achieve a given distance to consensus through theoretical and numerical results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788 · cited 1×
“Distributed agreement is a fundamental problem in ad hoc network applications, including distributed consensus and synchronization problems [6]–[8], [10], distributed coordination of mobile autonomous agents [4], [5], and distributed data fusion in sensor networks [3], [9], [11].”
BackgroundCoordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
On Distributed Averaging Algorithms and Quantization Effects
Nedic, A., Olshevsky, A., Ozdaglar, A., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2009.2031203 · Cited by 557
Convergence rate for consensus with delays
Nedić, A., & Ozdaglar, A. (2010) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10898-008-9370-2 · Cited by 198
Cited by
Sayed, A. H. (2014) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2306253 · Cited by 587
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002 · Cited by 553
Consensus of Hybrid Multi-Agent Systems
Zheng, Y., Ma, J., & Wang, L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2651402 · Cited by 391
Asynchronous Broadcast-Based Convex Optimization Over a Network
Nedic, A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2010.2079650 · Cited by 310
Push-Sum Distributed Dual Averaging for convex optimization
Tsianos, K. I., Lawlor, S., & Rabbat, M. G. (2012) · 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc.2012.6426375 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Aysal, T. C., Yildiz, M. E., Sarwate, A. D., & Scaglione, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2748-2761
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2161305486
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 53.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Broadcast Gossip Algorithms for Consensus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2009.2016247
- The paper
- Aysal, T. C., Yildiz, M. E., Sarwate, A. D., & Scaglione, A. (2009). Broadcast Gossip Algorithms for Consensus. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2009.2016247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.