The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Insight-Based Methodology for Evaluating Bioinformatics Visualizations
Abstract
High-throughput experiments, such as gene expression microarrays in the life sciences, result in very large data sets. In response, a wide variety of visualization tools have been created to facilitate data analysis. A primary purpose of these tools is to provide biologically relevant insight into the data. Typically, visualizations are evaluated in controlled studies that measure user performance on predetermined tasks or using heuristics and expert reviews. To evaluate and rank bioinformatics visualizations based on real-world data analysis scenarios, we developed a more relevant evaluation method that focuses on data insight. This paper presents several characteristics of insight that enabled us to recognize and quantify it in open-ended user tests. Using these characteristics, we evaluated five microarray visualization tools on the amount and types of insight they provide and the time it takes to acquire it. The results of the study guide biologists in selecting a visualization tool based on the type of their microarray data, visualization designers on the key role of user interaction techniques, and evaluators on a new approach for evaluating the effectiveness of visualizations for providing insight. Though we used the method to analyze bioinformatics visualizations, it can be applied to other domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Microarray data normalization and transformation
Quackenbush, J. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1032 · Cited by 1,975
Cited by
Toward measuring visualization insight
North, C. (2006) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/mcg.2006.70 · Cited by 456
Self-citationCollaborative visualization: Definition, challenges, and research agenda
Isenberg, P., Elmqvist, N., Scholtz, J., Cernea, D., Ma, K.-L., & Hagen, H. (2011) · Information Visualization · doi:10.1177/1473871611412817 · Cited by 299
Yi, J. S., Kang, Y.-A., Stasko, J. T., & Jacko, J. A. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 Workshop on BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization · doi:10.1145/1377966.1377971 · Cited by 175
Supporting Accessible Data Visualization Through Audio Data Narratives
Siu, A., S-H Kim, G., O'Modhrain, S., & Follmer, S. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517678 · Cited by 64
A Critical Reflection on Visualization Research: Where Do Decision Making Tasks Hide?
Dimara, E., & Stasko, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3114813 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Saraiya, P., North, C., & Duca, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 443-456
- ISSN
- 1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130774862
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Insight-Based Methodology for Evaluating Bioinformatics Visualizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvcg.2005.53
- The paper
- Saraiya, P., North, C., & Duca, K. (2005). An Insight-Based Methodology for Evaluating Bioinformatics Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2005.53
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.