The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-time markerless tracking for augmented reality: the virtual visual servoing framework
Abstract
Tracking is a very important research subject in a real-time augmented reality context. The main requirements for trackers are high accuracy and little latency at a reasonable cost. In order to address these issues, a real-time, robust, and efficient 3D model-based tracking algorithm is proposed for a "video see through" monocular vision system. The tracking of objects in the scene amounts to calculating the pose between the camera and the objects. Virtual objects can then be projected into the scene using the pose. Here, nonlinear pose estimation is formulated by means of a virtual visual servoing approach. In this context, the derivation of point-to-curves interaction matrices are given for different 3D geometrical primitives including straight lines, circles, cylinders, and spheres. A local moving edges tracker is used in order to provide real-time tracking of points normal to the object contours. Robustness is obtained by integrating an M-estimator into the visual control law via an iteratively reweighted least squares implementation. This approach is then extended to address the 3D model-free augmented reality problem. The method presented in this paper has been validated on several complex image sequences including outdoor environments. Results show the method to be robust to occlusion, changes in illumination, and mistracking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
Azuma, R. T. (1997) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 · Cited by 10,121
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking
Isard, M., & Blake, A. (1998) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008078328650 · Cited by 4,886
Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares.
Holland, P. W., & Welsch, R. E. (1977) · Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610927708827533 · Cited by 2,115
Cited by
Pose estimation for augmented reality: a hands-on survey
Marchand, E., Uchiyama, H., & Spindler, F. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2015.2513408 · Cited by 746
Chi, H.-L., Kang, S.-C., & Wang, X. (2013) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.12.017 · Cited by 476
Data Fusion for Visual Tracking With Particles
Perez, P., Vermaak, J., & Blake, A. (2004) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2003.823147 · Cited by 469
Opromolla, R., Fasano, G., Rufino, G., & Grassi, M. (2017) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.07.001 · Cited by 330
On ground validation of debris removal technologies
Colmenarejo, P., Graziano, M., Novelli, G., Mora, D., Serra, P., Tomassini, A., Seweryn, K., Prisco, G., & Fernandez, J. G. (2019) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.01.026 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Comport, A. I., Marchand, E., Pressigout, M., & Chaumette, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 615-628
- ISSN
- 1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108598000
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 25.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.