The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exploring the Benefits of Augmented Reality Documentation for Maintenance and Repair
Abstract
We explore the development of an experimental augmented reality application that provides benefits to professional mechanics performing maintenance and repair tasks in a field setting. We developed a prototype that supports military mechanics conducting routine maintenance tasks inside an armored vehicle turret, and evaluated it with a user study. Our prototype uses a tracked headworn display to augment a mechanic's natural view with text, labels, arrows, and animated sequences designed to facilitate task comprehension, localization, and execution. A within-subject controlled user study examined professional military mechanics using our system to complete 18 common tasks under field conditions. These tasks included installing and removing fasteners and indicator lights, and connecting cables, all within the cramped interior of an armored personnel carrier turret. An augmented reality condition was tested against two baseline conditions: the same headworn display providing untracked text and graphics and a fixed flat panel display representing an improved version of the laptop-based documentation currently employed in practice. The augmented reality condition allowed mechanics to locate tasks more quickly than when using either baseline, and in some instances, resulted in less overall head movement. A qualitative survey showed that mechanics found the augmented reality condition intuitive and satisfying for the tested sequence of tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course
Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002 · Cited by 1,210
Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis
Radu, I. (2014) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y · Cited by 1,045
Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review
Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002 · Cited by 1,036
Augmented reality technology in the manufacturing industry: A review of the last decade
Bottani, E., & Vignali, G. (2019) · IISE Transactions · doi:10.1080/24725854.2018.1493244 · Cited by 441
A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014
Dey, A., Billinghurst, M., Lindeman, R. W., & Swan, J. E. (2018) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00037 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, S., & Feiner, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1355-1368
- ISSN
- 1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130943454
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the Benefits of Augmented Reality Documentation for Maintenance and Repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvcg.2010.245
- The paper
- Henderson, S., & Feiner, S. (2011). Exploring the Benefits of Augmented Reality Documentation for Maintenance and Repair. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2010.245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.