Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 691

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electric Motor Drive Selection Issues for HEV Propulsion Systems: A Comparative Study

Zeraoulia, Mounir, Benbouzid, Mohamed El Hachemi, Diallo, Demba·2006·IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Abstract

This paper describes a comparative study allowing the selection of the most appropriate electric-propulsion system for a parallel hybrid electric vehicle (HEV). This paper is based on an exhaustive review of the state of the art and on an effective comparison of the performances of the four main electric-propulsion systems, namely the dc motor, the induction motor (IM), the permanent magnet synchronous motor, and the switched reluctance motor. The main conclusion drawn by the proposed comparative study is that it is the cage IM that better fulfills the major requirements of the HEV electric propulsion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvt.2006.878719

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 691

Metadata

Authors
Zeraoulia, M., Benbouzid, M. E. H., & Diallo, D.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
Published
2006-11
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
1756-1764
ISSN
0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990769746
Cited by
691
References
0
FWCI
41.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electric Motor Drive Selection Issues for HEV Propulsion Systems: A Comparative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvt.2006.878719
The paper
Zeraoulia, M., Benbouzid, M. E. H., & Diallo, D. (2006). Electric Motor Drive Selection Issues for HEV Propulsion Systems: A Comparative Study. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2006.878719

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.