Cited by 82Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Traffic control and managementCooperative Communication and Network Coding

Efficient and Reliable Broadcast in Intervehicle Communication Networks: A Cross-Layer Approach

Bi, Yuanguo, Cai, Lin X., Shen, Xuemin, Zhao, Hai·2010·IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Abstract

Broadcast transmission is an effective way to disseminate safety-related information for cooperative driving in intervehicle communication (IVC). However, it is fraught with fundamental challenges such as message redundancy, link unreliability, hidden terminals, and broadcast storms, which greatly degrade network performance. In this paper, we introduce a cross-layer approach to design an efficient and reliable broadcast protocol for emergency message dissemination in IVC systems. We first propose a novel composite relaying metric for relay selection by jointly considering geographical locations, physical-layer channel conditions, and moving velocities of vehicles. Based on the relaying metric, a distributed relay-selection scheme is proposed to assure that a unique relay is selected to reliably forward the emergency message in the desired propagation direction. We further apply IEEE 802.11e enhanced distributed coordination access (EDCA) medium-access control (MAC) to guarantee quality-of-service (QoS) provisioning to safety-related services. In addition, an analytical model is developed to study the performance of the proposed cross-layer broadcast protocol (CLBP) in terms of the relay-selection delay and the emergency message access delay. Network Simulator (NS-2) simulation results are given to validate our analysis. It is shown that the CLBP not only can minimize the broadcast message redundancy but can quickly and reliably deliver emergency messages in IVC as well.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvt.2010.2044905

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bi, Y., Cai, L. X., Shen, X., & Zhao, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Northeastern University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
Published
2010-06
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
2404-2417
ISSN
  • 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9359
OpenAlex
W2148234869
Cited by
82
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cooperative Communication and Network Coding
Keywords
vehicle-to-vehicle communication, broadcast protocols, cross-layer design, emergency information dissemination, cooperative driving, relay selection, hidden terminals, broadcast storm problem, IEEE 802.11e EDCA, medium access control, quality of service, message redundancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review