The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation on State of Charge Estimation of Batteries With Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter by Experiment Approach
Abstract
An accurate State-of-Charge (SoC) estimation plays a significant role in battery systems used in electric vehicles due to the arduous operation environments and the requirement of ensuring safe and reliable operations of batteries. Among the conventional methods to estimate SoC, the Coulomb counting method is widely used, but its accuracy is limited due to the accumulated error. Another commonly used method is model-based online iterative estimation with the Kalman filters, which improves the estimation accuracy in some extent. To improve the performance of Kalman filters in SoC estimation, the adaptive extended Kalman filter (AEKF), which employs the covariance matching approach, is applied in this paper. First, we built an implementation flowchart of the AEKF for a general system. Second, we built an online open-circuit voltage (OCV) estimation approach with the AEKF algorithm so that we can then get the SoC estimate by looking up the OCV-SoC table. Third, we proposed a robust online model-based SoC estimation approach with the AEKF algorithm. Finally, an evaluation on the SoC estimation approaches is performed by the experiment approach from the aspects of SoC estimation accuracy and robustness. The results indicate that the proposed online SoC estimation with the AEKF algorithm performs optimally, and for different error initial values, the maximum SoC estimation error is less than 2% with close-loop state estimation characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs
Plett, G. L. (2004) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.033 · Cited by 1,768
Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs
Plett, G. L. (2004) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.031 · Cited by 1,385
Online estimation of model parameters and state-of-charge of LiFePO4 batteries in electric vehicles
He, H., Xiong, R., & Guo, H. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.08.005 · Cited by 388
Self-citation
Cited by
Hannan, M. A., Lipu, M. S. H., Hussain, A., & Mohamed, A. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.001 · Cited by 2,005
Waag, W., Fleischer, C., & Sauer, D. U. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.064 · Cited by 1,059
Shrivastava, P., Soon, T. K., Idris, M. Y. I. B., & Mekhilef, S. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.040 · Cited by 704
Nyamathulla, S., & Dhanamjayulu, C. (2024) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.111179 · Cited by 518
Design Methodology of LLC Resonant Converters for Electric Vehicle Battery Chargers
Deng, J., Li, S., Hu, S., Mi, C. C., & Ma, R. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2013.2287379 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, R., He, H., Sun, F., & Zhao, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 108-117
- ISSN
- 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9359
- OpenAlex
- W2067682030
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation on State of Charge Estimation of Batteries With Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter by Experiment Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvt.2012.2222684
- The paper
- Xiong, R., He, H., Sun, F., & Zhao, K. (2013). Evaluation on State of Charge Estimation of Batteries With Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter by Experiment Approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2012.2222684
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.