Cited by 1,385Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesControl Systems and Identification

Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs

Plett, Gregory L.·2004·Journal of Power Sources

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.031

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plett, G. L.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Corresponding author
Plett, Gregory L.
Venue
Journal of Power Sources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
134
Issue
2
Pages
252-261
ISSN
0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166618387
Cited by
1,385
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 127 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 70
FWCI
23.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
battery management systems, hybrid electric vehicles, lithium polymer batteries, battery pack, state of charge estimation, power fade, capacity fade, cellular aging, cell modeling, system identification, extended Kalman filter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review