The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing Electric Vehicle Charging: A Customer's Perspective
Abstract
Electric vehicles (EVs) are considered to be a promising solution for current gas shortage and emission problems. To maximize the benefits of using EVs, regulated and optimized charging control needs to be provided by load aggregators for connected vehicles. An EV charging network is a typical cyber-physical system, which includes a power grid and a large number of EVs and aggregators that collect information and control the charging procedure. In this paper, we studied EV charging scheduling problems from a customer's perspective by jointly considering the aggregator's revenue and customers' demands and costs. We considered two charging scenarios: static and dynamic. In the static charging scenario, customers' charging demands are provided to the aggregator in advance; however, in the dynamic charging scenario, an EV may come and leave at any time, which is not known to the aggregator in advance. We present linear programming (LP)-based optimal schemes for the static problems and effective heuristic algorithms for the dynamic problems. The dynamic scenario is more realistic; however, the solutions to the static problems can be used to show potential revenue gains and cost savings that can be brought by regulated charging and, thus, can serve as a benchmark for performance evaluation. It has been shown by extensive simulation results based on real electricity price and load data that significant revenue gains and cost savings can be achieved by optimal charging scheduling compared with an unregulated baseline approach, and moreover, the proposed dynamic charging scheduling schemes provide close-to-optimal solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kempton, W., & Tomić, J. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.022 · Cited by 2,126
Optimal Charging Strategies for Unidirectional Vehicle-to-Grid
Sortomme, E., & El-Sharkawi, M. A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2010.2090910 · Cited by 782
Cited by
A Survey of Algorithms for Distributed Charging Control of Electric Vehicles in Smart Grid
Nimalsiri, N. I., Mediwaththe, C. P., Ratnam, E. L., Shaw, M., Smith, D. B., & Halgamuge, S. K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2019.2943620 · Cited by 271
Kumar, M., Panda, K. P., Naayagi, R. T., Thakur, R., & Panda, G. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13158919 · Cited by 221
Optimized Integration of Electric Vehicles in Low Voltage Distribution Grids
Spitzer, M., Schlund, J., Apostolaki-Iosifidou, E., & Pruckner, M. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12214059 · Cited by 52
Melhorn, A. C., McKenna, K., Keane, A., Flynn, D., & Dimitrovski, A. (2017) · IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0652 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, C., Tang, J., & Ghosh, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2919-2927
- ISSN
- 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9359
- OpenAlex
- W2068680147
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimizing Electric Vehicle Charging: A Customer's Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvt.2013.2251023
- The paper
- Jin, C., Tang, J., & Ghosh, P. (2013). Optimizing Electric Vehicle Charging: A Customer's Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2013.2251023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.