Cited by 83Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCryptography and Data Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Secure SVM Training Over Vertically-Partitioned Datasets Using Consortium Blockchain for Vehicular Social Networks

Shen, Meng, Zhang, Jie, Zhu, Liehuang, Xu, Ke, Tang, Xiangyun·2020·IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) techniques are expected to be used for specific applications in Vehicular Social Networks (VSNs). Support vector machine (SVM) is one of the typical ML methods and widely used for its high efficiency. Due to the limitation of data sources, the data collected by different entities usually contain attributes that are quite different. However, in some real-world scenarios, when training an SVM classifier, many entities face the same problem that they are lacking in data with adequate attributes. Thus multiple entities are required to share data to combine a dataset with diverse attributes and then jointly train a comprehensive classifier. However, data privacy concerns are raised because of data sharing. To sovle the problem, we propose a privacy-preserving SVM classifier training scheme over vertically-partitioned datasets posessed by multiple data providers. In our scheme, we utilize consortium blockchain and threshold homomorphic cryptosystem to establish a secure SVM classifier training platform without a trusted third-party. We keep lots of training operations locally over original data and necessary interactions between participants are protected by the threshold Paillier and consortium blockchain. Security analysis proves that our scheme can preserve the privacy of the original data and the training intermediate values. Extensive experiments indicate that our scheme has high efficiency and no accuracy loss.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvt.2019.2957425

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1017/CBO9780511546891 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/2976749.2978318 · DOI · Paper page
  3. gascón, 2016, Secure linear regression on vertically partitioned datasets, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2016, 892
  4. shokri, 0, Privacy-preserving deep learning, Proc 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conf Comput Commun Secur, 1310
  5. 10.1109/MNET.001.1800503 · DOI
  6. iansiti, 2017, The truth about blockchain, Harvard Bus Rev, 95, 118
  7. 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.06.016 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/TII.2019.2945367 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1109/TIFS.2019.2929409 · DOI · Paper page
  10. song, 0, Practical techniques for searches on encrypted data, Proc IEEE S&P, 44
  11. 10.14722/ndss.2015.23241 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/MWC.2019.1800289 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2871607 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TETC.2015.2511457 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TCC.2017.2769645 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/3243734.3243760 · DOI
  17. fouque, 2000, Sharing decryption in the context of voting or lotteries, International Conference on Financial Cryptography, 90
  18. 10.1109/COMST.2015.2453481 · DOI
  19. 10.1201/b17668 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600263 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TVT.2019.2895834 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.future.2019.01.026 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/JSAC.2019.2895473 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/MWC.2016.1600317WC · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1145/3190508.3190519 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/MCOM.001.1900091 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/MNET.2018.1700460 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/TIFS.2017.2692682 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/TIFS.2017.2774451 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/ICDCS.2015.40 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/SP.2013.30 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/MNET.2018.1700374 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2901840 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/TIFS.2018.2868162 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shen, M., Zhang, J., Zhu, L., Xu, K., & Tang, X.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
Published
2020-06
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
5773-5783
ISSN
  • 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9359
OpenAlex
W2993620483
Cited by
83
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 23
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2018YFB0803405)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61972039, 61872041, 61602039)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (4192050)
  • China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists (61825204)
  • Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (BJJWZYJH01201910003011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
support vector machine, privacy-preserving machine learning, consortium blockchain, threshold homomorphic encryption, Paillier cryptosystem, vehicular social networks, data sharing, data privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review