Cited by 569Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCryptography and Data SecurityBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

Efficient and Privacy-Enhanced Federated Learning for Industrial Artificial Intelligence

Hao, Meng, Li, Hongwei, Luo, Xizhao, Xu, Guowen, Yang, Haomiao, Liu, Sen·2020·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Abstract

By leveraging deep learning-based technologies, industrial artificial intelligence (IAI) has been applied to solve various industrial challenging problems in Industry 4.0. However, for privacy reasons, traditional centralized training may be unsuitable for sensitive data-driven industrial scenarios, such as healthcare and autopilot. Recently, federated learning has received widespread attention, since it enables participants to collaboratively learn a shared model without revealing their local data. However, studies have shown that, by exploiting the shared parameters adversaries can still compromise industrial applications such as auto-driving navigation systems, medical data in wearable devices, and industrial robots' decision making. In this article, to solve this problem, we propose an efficient and privacy-enhanced federated learning (PEFL) scheme for IAI. Compared with existing solutions, PEFL is noninteractive, and can prevent private data from being leaked even if multiple entities collude with each other. Moreover, extensive experiments with real-world data demonstrate the superiority of PEFL in terms of accuracy and efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tii.2019.2945367

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FL can play an important role in establishing intelligent caching policies to cope with the explosive growth of mobile data in modern IoT networks.

    “IoT data offloaded from mobile devices can be cached by edge servers [65] where FL can play an important role in establishing intelligent caching policies, in order to cope with the explosive growth of mobile data in modern IoT networks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hao, M., Li, H., Luo, X., Xu, G., Yang, H., & Liu, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Soochow University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Published
2020-10
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
6532-6542
ISSN
  • 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0050
OpenAlex
W2977797911
Cited by
569
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 2
FWCI
28.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB0802300, 2017YFB0802000)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61972454, 61802051, 61772121, 61728102, 61472065)
  • Peng Cheng Laboratory Project of Guangdong Province (PCL2018KP004)
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Cryptography and Information Security (GCIS201804)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
federated learning, privacy preservation, industrial AI, collusion resistance, data loss prevention, Industry 4.0, medical data privacy, autonomous driving, wearable devices, industrial robots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review