Cited by 295IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization

Deep learning for hybrid 5G services in mobile edge computing systems: learn from a digital twin

Open access
Dong, Rui, She, Changyang, Hardjawana, Wibowo, Li, Yonghui, Vucetic, Branka·2019·IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a mobile edge computing system with both ultra-reliable and low-latency communications services and delay tolerant services. We aim to minimize the normalized energy consumption, defined as the energy consumption per bit, by optimizing user association, resource allocation, and offloading probabilities subject to the quality-of-service requirements. The user association is managed by the mobility management entity (MME), while resource allocation and offloading probabilities are determined by each access point (AP). We propose a deep learning (DL) architecture, where a digital twin of the real network environment is used to train the DL algorithm off-line at a central server. From the pre-trained deep neural network (DNN), the MME can obtain user association scheme in a real-time manner. Considering that the real networks are not static, the digital twin monitors the variation of real networks and updates the DNN accordingly. For a given user association scheme, we propose an optimization algorithm to find the optimal resource allocation and offloading probabilities at each AP. The simulation results show that our method can achieve lower normalized energy consumption with less computation complexity compared with an existing method and approach to the performance of the global optimal solution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/twc.2019.2927312

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advanced ML techniques such as reinforcement learning and predictive analytics can optimize synchronization processes by predicting updates and reducing computational loads.

    “Advanced ML techniques, such as reinforcement learning and predictive analytics, can optimize synchronization processes by predicting updates and reducing computational loads [130].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, R., She, C., Hardjawana, W., Li, Y., & Vucetic, B.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Published
2019-10
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
4692-4707
ISSN
  • 1536-1276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2248
OpenAlex
W2962737505
Cited by
295
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 1
FWCI
16.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Research Award (DE150101704)
  • Australian Research Council (DP150104019, DP190101988)
  • Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship (FL160100032)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Keywords
mobile edge computing, 5G services, digital twin, deep learning, user association, resource allocation, energy consumption per bit, ultra-reliable low-latency communication, delay-tolerant services, quality of service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review