Cited by 102Spam and Phishing DetectionMisinformation and Its ImpactsSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Using BERT to Extract Topic-Independent Sentiment Features for Social Media Bot Detection

Heidari, Maryam, Jones, James H·2020·2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)

Abstract

Millions of online posts about different topics and products are shared on popular social media platforms. One use of this content is to provide crowd-sourced information about a specific topic, event, or product. However, this use raises an important question: what percentage of the information available through these services is trustworthy? In particular, might some of this information be generated by a machine, i.e., a "bot" instead of a human? Bots can be, and often are, purposely designed to generate enough volume to skew an apparent trend or position on a topic, yet the consumer of such content cannot easily distinguish a bot post from a human post. This paper introduces a new model that uses Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (Google Bert) for sentiment classification of tweets to identify topic-independent features for the social media bot detection model. Using a Natural Language Processing approach to derive topic-independent features for the new bot detection model distinguishes this work from previous bot detection models. We achieve 94% accuracy classifying the contents of Cresci data set [1] as generated by a bot or a human, where the most accurate prior work achieved an accuracy of 92%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/uemcon51285.2020.9298158

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Content posted by bots provides essential clues for bot detection.

    “Content posted by bots also provides essential clues (Kudugunta and Ferrara, 2018;Heidari and Jones, 2020).”

    From Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnet (2024) · cites this paper as Heidari and Jones, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heidari, M., & Jones, J. H.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Venue
2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-10-28
Pages
0542-0547
OpenAlex
W3116492894
Cited by
102
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 7
FWCI
13.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
BERT, sentiment classification, tweets, machine-generated content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review