Cited by 18Misinformation and Its ImpactsSpam and Phishing DetectionHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Automated Identification of Social Media Bots Using Deepfake Text Detection

Saravani, Sina Mahdipour, Ray, Indrajit, Ray, Indrakshi·2021·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-92571-0_7

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subsequent studies have built upon the Fagni et al. dataset to explore various strategies for bot detection based on content.

    “Subsequent studies have built upon this dataset to explore various strategies for bot detection based on content (Saravani et al., 2021;Gambini et al., 2022;Tourille et al., 2022).”

    From Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnet (2024) · cites this paper as Saravani et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saravani, S. M., Ray, I., & Ray, I.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Saravani, Sina Mahdipour
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2021
Pages
111-123
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4206070471
Cited by
18
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
7.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
misinformation, Twitter, end-to-end neural network, real-time detection, spam

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review