Cited by 47Tactile and Sensory InteractionsTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Effect of Electrical Stimulation Haptic Feedback on Perceptions of Softness-Hardness and Stickiness While Touching a Virtual Object

Yem, Vibol, Vu, Kevin, Kon, Yuki, Kajimoto, Hiroyuki·2018·2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)

Abstract

With the advantages of small size and light weight, electrical stimulation devices have been investigated for providing haptic feedback in relation to virtual objects. Electrical stimulation devices can directly activate sensory receptors to produce a reaction force or touch sensations. In the current study, we tested a new method of electrically inducing force sensation in the fingertip, presenting haptic feedback designed to alter perceptions of softness, hardness and stickiness. We developed a 3D virtual reality system combined with finger-motion capture and electrical stimulation devices. We conducted two experiments to evaluate our electrical stimulation method and analyzed the effects of electrical stimulation on perception. The first experiment confirmed that participants could distinguish between the directions of the illusory force sensation, reporting whether the stimulation flexed their index finger forward or extended it backward. The second experiment examined the effects of the electric current itself on the intensity of their perception of the softness, hardness and stickiness of a virtual object.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/vr.2018.8446403

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yem, V., Vu, K., Kon, Y., & Kajimoto, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Electro-Communications (JP)
  • Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie (FR)
Venue
2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-03
Pages
89-96
ISSN
1087-8270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889252014
Cited by
47
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
electrical stimulation, haptic feedback, virtual reality, softness perception, hardness perception, fingertip sensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review