Cited by 51Digital Media Forensic DetectionFace recognition and analysisGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

TI 2 Net: Temporal Identity Inconsistency Network for Deepfake Detection

Liu, Baoping, Liu, Bo, Ding, Ming, Zhu, Tianqing, Yu, Xin·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose the Temporal Identity Inconsistency Network (TI2Net), a Deepfake detector that focuses on temporal identity inconsistency. Specifically, TI2Net recognizes fake videos by capturing the dissimilarities of human faces among video frames of the same identity. Therefore, TI2Net is a reference-agnostic detector and can be used on unseen datasets. For a video clip of a given identity, identity information in all frames will first be encoded to identity vectors. TI2Net learns the temporal identity embedding from the temporal difference of the identity vectors. The temporal embedding, representing the identity inconsistency in the video clip, is finally used to determine the authenticity of the video clip. During training, TI2Net incorporates triplet loss to learn more discriminative temporal embeddings. We conduct comprehensive experiments to evaluate the performance of the proposed TI2Net. Experimental results indicate that TI2Net generalizes well to unseen manipulations and datasets with unseen identities. Besides, TI2Net also shows robust performance against compression and additive noise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00467

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Image-based detectors that achieve near-perfect accuracy cannot simply be applied frame-by-frame to videos, because they miss critical temporal inconsistencies such as unnatural head movements, flickering artifacts, and inter-frame coherence violations.

    “Image-based detectors that achieve near-perfect accuracy cannot simply be applied frame-by-frame to videos, as they miss critical temporal inconsistencies such as unnatural head movements, flickering artifacts, and inter-frame coherence violations [10-12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, B., Liu, B., Ding, M., Zhu, T., & Yu, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-01
Pages
4680-4689
ISSN
2472-6737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319300180
Cited by
50
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 4
FWCI
5.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
deepfake detection, video authenticity, identity embedding, triplet loss, temporal embeddings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review