Cited by 42Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques

Fsbi: Deepfake detection with frequency enhanced self-blended images

Abul Hasanaath, Ahmed, Luqman, Hamzah, Katib, Raed, Anwar, Saeed·2025·Image and Vision Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imavis.2025.105418

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNN-based methods have a significant limitation: lack of temporal consistency and inability to process video in real time.

    “A significant limitation of these CNN-based methods is their lack of temporal consistency and inability to process video in real time.”
  • Numerous cutting-edge deepfake detection techniques use multistage designs, including ensemble classifiers or sequential frame analysis, which cause computing bottlenecks during inference.

    “Numerous cutting-edge techniques use multistage designs, including ensemble classifiers or sequential frame analysis, which cause computing bottlenecks during inference [7].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abul Hasanaath, A., Luqman, H., Katib, R., & Anwar, S.
Affiliations
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Corresponding author
Luqman, Hamzah
Venue
Image and Vision Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-02
Volume
154
Pages
105418
ISSN
0262-8856 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406739280
Cited by
34
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 12
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Image and Vision Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Keywords
deepfake detection, discrete wavelet transform, convolutional neural networks, cross-dataset generalization, image editing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review