Cited by 28Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SSFE-Net: Self-Supervised Feature Enhancement for Ultra-Fine-Grained Few-Shot Class Incremental Learning

Open access
Pan, Zicheng, Yu, Xiaohan, Zhang, Miaohua, Gao, Yongsheng·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

Abstract

Ultra-Fine-Grained Visual Categorization (ultra-FGVC) has become a popular problem due to its great real-world potential for classifying the same or closely related species with very similar layouts. However, there present many challenges for the existing ultra-FGVC methods, firstly there are always not enough samples in the existing ultraFGVC datasets based on which the models can easily get overfitting. Secondly, in practice, we are likely to find new species that we have not seen before and need to add them to existing models, which is known as incremental learning. The existing methods solve these problems by Few-Shot Class Incremental Learning (FSCIL), but the main challenge of the FSCIL models on ultra-FGVC tasks lies in their inferior discrimination detection ability since they usually use low-capacity networks to extract features, which leads to insufficient discriminative details extraction from ultrafine-grained images. In this paper, a self-supervised feature enhancement for the few-shot incremental learning network (SSFE-Net) is proposed to solve this problem. Specifically, a self-supervised learning (SSL) and knowledge distillation (KD) framework is developed to enhance the feature extraction of the low-capacity backbone network for ultra-FGVC few-shot class incremental learning tasks. Besides, we for the first time create a series of benchmarks for FSCIL tasks on two public ultra-FGVC datasets and three normal finegrained datasets, which will facilitate the deve…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00621

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have introduced datasets for various FSCIL scenarios, but there remains significant scope for dataset enhancement.

    “Some studies, such as [64], have introduced datasets for various FSCIL scenarios, but there remains significant scope for dataset enhancement.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Achituve, Gp-tree: A gaussian process classifier for few-shot incremental learning, 54
  2. 10.24963/ijcai.2021/295 · DOI
  3. Bachman, Learning representations by maximizing mutual information across views, 32
  4. Caron, Unsupervised learning of visual features by contrasting cluster assignments, 33, 9912
  5. 10.1007/978-3-030-01258-8_15 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/ICASSP39728.2021.9413783 · DOI
  7. Chen, Incremental few-shot learning via vector quantization in deep embedded space
  8. Chen, A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations, 1597
  9. 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01549 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01345 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00256 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00815 · DOI
  13. 10.5555/3495724.3497510 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00975 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00092 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1109/ICCVW.2013.77 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.01.029 · DOI
  18. Maji, 2013, Fine-grained visual classification of aircraft
  19. Mazumder, Fewshot lifelong learning, 35, 2337
  20. 10.1109/DICTA52665.2021.9647389 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/978-3-030-58571-6_38 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/DICTA52665.2021.9647081 · DOI
  23. Tao, Few-shot classincremental learning, 12183
  24. 10.1007/978-3-030-58568-6_16 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Vinyals, Matching networks for one shot learning, 29
  26. 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00701 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.109078 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108691 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108067 · DOI
  30. 10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6968 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01012 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01227 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1109/tpami.2021.3133897 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.107114 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107938 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108229 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.319 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00581 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00673 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pan, Z., Yu, X., Zhang, M., & Gao, Y.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-01
Pages
6264-6273
ISSN
2472-6737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319300850
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.97
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
few-shot class-incremental learning, knowledge distillation, discriminative feature extraction, overfitting, benchmark dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review