Cited by 23Online Learning and AnalyticsData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsMedical Education and Admissions

“Graduate admission chance prediction using deep neural network,”

Omaer Faruq Goni, Md., Matin, Abdul, Hasan, Tonmoy, Abu Ismail Siddique, Md., Jyoti, Oishi, Sifnatul Hasnain, Fahim MD·2020·2020 IEEE International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE)

Abstract

Every year many students apply for graduate admission to different universities. To select an applicant, each university has different selection criteria such as GRE score, CGPA, research background, statement of purpose, letter of recommendation, university rating etc. There are some web applications as well as some consultancy services for suggesting the appropriate university based on students' portfolio. These help to give an idea which universities should be applied for admission. But they have limitations because humans are incapable of considering all the conditions and universities. Moreover, web applications have accuracy problems. In this study, we have proposed a deep neural network (DNN) to predict the chance of getting admitted to a university according to the students portfolio. All the selection criteria are considered here to predict the chance of admission. The DNN model has been compared with existing methods in terms of different performance metrics including mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared score. It has shown the most promising result that includes R-squared score of 0.8538 and MSE of 0.0031. The proposed method has also outperformed all the existing methods in each benchmark.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wiecon-ece52138.2020.9397988

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another research direction approaches the admissions problem from the perspective of students by predicting the probability that an applicant will get admission at a particular university in order to help applicants better target universities based on their profiles as well as university rankings.

    “Another research direction in this domain approaches the admissions problem from the perspective of students by predicting the probability that an applicant will get admission at a particular university in order to help applicants better target universities based on their profiles as well as university rankings (AlGhamdi et al., 2020; Goni et al., 2020; Mridha et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omaer Faruq Goni, M., Matin, A., Hasan, T., Abu Ismail Siddique, M., Jyoti, O., & Sifnatul Hasnain, F. M.
Affiliations
Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology (BD)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-12-26
Pages
259-262
OpenAlex
W3156084387
Cited by
23
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
university admission, student portfolios, deep neural network, cumulative grade point average, statement of purpose, letters of recommendation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review