“Graduate admission chance prediction using deep neural network,”
Abstract
Every year many students apply for graduate admission to different universities. To select an applicant, each university has different selection criteria such as GRE score, CGPA, research background, statement of purpose, letter of recommendation, university rating etc. There are some web applications as well as some consultancy services for suggesting the appropriate university based on students' portfolio. These help to give an idea which universities should be applied for admission. But they have limitations because humans are incapable of considering all the conditions and universities. Moreover, web applications have accuracy problems. In this study, we have proposed a deep neural network (DNN) to predict the chance of getting admitted to a university according to the students portfolio. All the selection criteria are considered here to predict the chance of admission. The DNN model has been compared with existing methods in terms of different performance metrics including mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared score. It has shown the most promising result that includes R-squared score of 0.8538 and MSE of 0.0031. The proposed method has also outperformed all the existing methods in each benchmark.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another research direction approaches the admissions problem from the perspective of students by predicting the probability that an applicant will get admission at a particular university in order to help applicants better target universities based on their profiles as well as university rankings.
“Another research direction in this domain approaches the admissions problem from the perspective of students by predicting the probability that an applicant will get admission at a particular university in order to help applicants better target universities based on their profiles as well as university rankings (AlGhamdi et al., 2020; Goni et al., 2020; Mridha et al., 2022).”
From Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Goni et al., 2020
Cites
Artificial Neural Networks - Architectures and Applications
Suzuki, K. (2013) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/3409 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
A Comparison of Regression Models for Prediction of Graduate Admissions
Acharya, M. S., Armaan, A., & Antony, A. S. (2019) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Data Science (ICCIDS) · doi:10.1109/iccids.2019.8862140 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
“A machine learning approach for graduate admission prediction,”
AlGhamdi, A., Barsheed, A., AlMshjary, H., & AlGhamdi, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Image, Video and Signal Processing · doi:10.1145/3388818.3393716 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
A Statistical Approach to Graduate Admissions’ Chance Prediction
Chakrabarty, N., Chowdhury, S., & Rana, S. (2020) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-2043-3_38 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review
Mallik, S., & Gangopadhyay, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1151391 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
- Authors
- Omaer Faruq Goni, M., Matin, A., Hasan, T., Abu Ismail Siddique, M., Jyoti, O., & Sifnatul Hasnain, F. M.
- Affiliations
- Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology (BD)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-12-26
- Pages
- 259-262
- OpenAlex
- W3156084387
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Keywords
- university admission, student portfolios, deep neural network, cumulative grade point average, statement of purpose, letters of recommendation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review