Cited by 30Online Learning and AnalyticsData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

“A machine learning approach for graduate admission prediction,”

AlGhamdi, Amal, Barsheed, Amal, AlMshjary, Hanadi, AlGhamdi, Hanan·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Image, Video and Signal Processing

Abstract

With the increase in the number of graduates who wish to pursue their education, it becomes more challenging to get admission to the students' dream university. Newly graduate students usually are not knowledgeable of the requirements and the procedures of the postgraduate admission and might spent a considerable amount of money to get advice from consultancy organizations to help them identify their admission chances. However, giving the limited number of universities that can be considered by a human consultant, this approach might be bias and inaccurate. Thus, in this paper, a machine learning approach is developed to automatically predict the possibility of postgraduate admission to help graduates recognizing and targeting the universities which are best suitable for their profile. This paper evaluates three learning strategies of regression to predict the university rate given the students' profile; namely, linear regression, decision tree, and logistic regression model. This paper evaluates, these models to select the best model in terms of the highest accuracy rate and the least error. Logistic Regression model shows the most accurate prediction in our experiments, and hence, we suggest employing this model to predict the future applicant's university chance of admission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3388818.3393716

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another research direction approaches the admissions problem from the perspective of students by predicting the probability that an applicant will get admission at a particular university in order to help applicants better target universities based on their profiles as well as university rankings.

    “Another research direction in this domain approaches the admissions problem from the perspective of students by predicting the probability that an applicant will get admission at a particular university in order to help applicants better target universities based on their profiles as well as university rankings (AlGhamdi et al., 2020; Goni et al., 2020; Mridha et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AlGhamdi, A., Barsheed, A., AlMshjary, H., & AlGhamdi, H.
Affiliations
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Image, Video and Signal Processing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-03-20
Pages
155-158
OpenAlex
W3028426049
Cited by
30
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Image, Video and Signal Processing (IVSP) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
postgraduate admission, admission probability, university admission selection, student profile, logistic regression, linear regression, decision tree, model comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review