The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction
Open accessAbstract
The distance-dependent structure-derived potentials developed so far all employed a reference state that can be characterized as a residue (atom)-averaged state. Here, we establish a new reference state called the distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference (DFIRE) state. The reference state is used to construct a residue-specific all-atom potential of mean force from a database of 1011 nonhomologous (less than 30% homology) protein structures with resolution less than 2 A. The new all-atom potential recognizes more native proteins from 32 multiple decoy sets, and raises an average Z-score by 1.4 units more than two previously developed, residue-specific, all-atom knowledge-based potentials. When only backbone and C(beta) atoms are used in scoring, the performance of the DFIRE-based potential, although is worse than that of the all-atom version, is comparable to those of the previously developed potentials on the all-atom level. In addition, the DFIRE-based all-atom potential provides the most accurate prediction of the stabilities of 895 mutants among three knowledge-based all-atom potentials. Comparison with several physical-based potentials is made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These datasets have been widely used to test the predictive power of the PPI prediction methods [12, 13, 27–29, 29–35].”
From Deep geometric representations for modeling effects of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jorgensen, W. L., Maxwell, D. S., & Tirado-Rives, J. (1996) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9621760 · Cited by 14,078
CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations
Brooks, B., Bruccoleri, R., Olafson, B. D., States, D., Swaminathan, S., & Karplus, M. (1983) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540040211 · Cited by 13,736
Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles
Lüthy, R., Bowie, J., & Eisenberg, D. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/356083a0 · Cited by 3,588
An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids
Weiner, S. J., Kollman, P. A., Nguyen, D. T., & Case, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540070216 · Cited by 3,450
Recognition of errors in three‐dimensional structures of proteins
Sippl, M. J. (1993) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340170404 · Cited by 2,156
Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00442-4 · Cited by 1,728
Miyazawa, S., & Jernigan, R. L. (1985) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00145a039 · Cited by 1,523
The GROMOS Biomolecular Simulation Program Package
Scott, W. R. P., Hünenberger, P. H., Tironi, I. G., Mark, A. E., Billeter, S. R., Fennen, J., Torda, A. E., Huber, T., Krüger, P., & A, W. F. V. G. (1999) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp984217f · Cited by 1,489
Simons, K. T., Kooperberg, C. L., Huang, E. S., & Baker, D. A. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.0959 · Cited by 1,405
Duan, Y., & Kollman, P. A. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5389.740 · Cited by 1,337
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 901
Atom-ProteinQA: Atom-level protein model quality assessment through fine-grained joint learning
Han, Y., Lu, Y., Yan, X., Cui, H., Cheng, S., Zheng, J. X., Zhou, Y., Wang, S., & Li, Z. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108078 · Cited by 1
Challenges of Protein-Protein Docking of the Membrane Proteins
Kiani, Y. S., & Jabeen, I. (2024) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_12 · Cited by 1
Fang, B. (2022) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · doi:10.57709/1229177 · Cited by 1
Hassan, S. A. (2016) · VAWKUM Transactions on Computer Sciences · doi:10.21015/vtcs.v11i1.442 · Cited by 1
Disorder–Order Transitions in Conformational Selection of a Peptide by Ebola Virus Nucleoprotein
Olson, M. A. (2020) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b03581 · Cited by 1
AbdelGawwad, M. R., & Ozdemir, A. T. (2020) · Heritage and Sustainable Development · doi:10.37868/hsd.v2i1.32 · Cited by 1
Feature Importance in the Quality of Protein Templates
Adilović, M., & Hromić‐Jahjefendić, A. (2021) · Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN) · doi:10.21533/pen.v9.i2.786 · Cited by 1
Low Rank Approximation Methods for Identifying Impactful Pairwise Protein Mutations
Daw, C., Cruz, B. B., Majeske, N., Jagodzinski, F., Islam, T. Z., & Hutchinson, B. (2012) · Computational biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05914-8_4 · Cited by 1
PENSAMIENTO CRÍTICO EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y ACADÉMICA
Torres, C. M. G., Colque, J. P. B., Paredes-Quispe, J. R., Colque, J. P. B., Colque, J. P. B., Salluca, H. T., Pastor, W., Pastrana, J. C. B., Auqui, J. A. O., Antonio, J., et al. (2023) · doi:10.34893/e1150-3660-8721-s
3D Structure Modeling of a Transmembrane Protein, Fatty Acid Elongase
Chumningan, S., Pornputtapong, N., Laoteng, K., Cheevadhanarak, S., & Thammarongtham, C. (2010) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16750-8_4 · Cited by 1
“The following methods, Anolea [20], DFire [ 21 ], and MolProbity [22] were performed.”
MethodInterfacial atom pair analysis
Li, Y., & Zeng, Z.-H. (2008) · Biochemistry (Moscow) · doi:10.1134/s0006297908020156 · Cited by 1
GEMSCORE: A New Empirical Energy Function for Protein Folding
Chiu, Y.-Y., Hwang, J., & Yang, J. (2005) · IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) · doi:10.1109/cibcb.2005.1594933 · Cited by 1
“Energy functions of PSP computational methods are generally rooted in the thermodynamic hypothesis the nativestate conformations is the most stable conformation.”
BackgroundPrediction of Factors Determining Changes in Stability in Protein Mutants
Parthiban, V. (2006) · Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) · Cited by 1
Wang, J. (2015) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 1
Dubey, K., Goswami, S., Kumar, N., Kumar, R. R., & Niraj, R. R. K. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.04.17.046094 · Cited by 1
Miao, C., Gao, X., Mao, J., Wang, W., Li, Z., Chen, Z., Wen, Z., Huang, Y., Huang, X., Liang, X., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.02.27.640678 · Cited by 1
Models Predicting Effects of Missense Mutations in Oncogenesis
Addepalli, K. (2014) · doi:10.13021/mars/7671 · Cited by 1
CRANBERRY: A Coarse-grained RNA Model with Sugar Puckering and Noncanonical Base PairingPreprint
Wu, Y., Alessandri, R., Coraor, A. E., Peng, X., Rico, P. F. Z., Liebl, K., Salame, C., Trinh, K. R., Sosnick, T. R., & Pablo, J. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.12.699131 · Cited by 1
Audie, J., & Ponomarev, S. Y. (2010) · Nature Precedings · doi:10.1038/npre.2010.4545.1
“Importantly, a high resolution crystal structure of GFD NAPP (28-123) is available.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMESSM : a framework for protein threading by neural networks and support vector machines
Jiang, N. (2005) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)
Molecular Modeling and Simulation of Membrane Transport Proteins
Jurik, A., Klepsch, F., & Zdrazil, B. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/38529
“The SWISSMODEL (Arnold et al., 2006) (http://swissmodel.expasy.org) and the SAVES server (http://nihserver.mbi.ucla.edu/SAVES), for instance, offer a variety of local and global quality estimation tools (Benkert et al., 2011; Hutchinson & Thornton, 1996; Zhou & Zhou, 2002).”
MethodModelling the effects of single point mutations on the structure and function of proteins
Battey, J. N. D. (2009) · edoc (University of Basel) · doi:10.5451/unibas-005159299
Neural Network Pairwise Interaction Fields for Protein Model Quality Assessment
Martín, A. J. M., Vullo, A., & Pollastri, G. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11169-3_17
Protein sequence-structure relationships
Leelananda, S. P. (2011) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-1280
Sadowski, M. I., & MacDonald, J. T. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9783527631827.ch14
EVOLUTIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF A SERINE PROTEASE IN S podoptera litura
Yang, L. C., Tang, Z., Liu, W., Xiao, J., Hu, S., Yang, L. C., Liu, W., Deng, H., & Feng, Q. (2012) · Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1002/arch.21049
Structural Learning for Template-free Protein FoldingPreprint
Zhao, F. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1311.1422
Unbound Protein-Protein Docking Selections by the DFIRE-based Statistical Pair PotentialPreprint
Liu, S., Zhang, C., & Zhou, Y. (2004) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.q-bio/0406025
“For example, the numbers of near-native structures given by DFIRE are higher for 22 protein complexes and lower for 12 protein complexes than those given by ZDOCK 1.3.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAlgorithms For Computational Description Of Large Scale Conformational Transitions Of Proteins
Májek, P. (2010) · eCommons (Cornell University)
Masso, M. (2010) · International Journal of Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics · doi:10.4018/jkdb.2010100103
An improved method of potential of mean force for protein-protein interactions
Su, Y., Li, W., Zhang, J., Wang, J., & Wang, W. (2008) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1007/s11434-008-0036-8
Efficient Loop Selections Using an Energy Function Based on Bayesian Theorem
Shi, X. (2011) · Procedia Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.068
Rakhmanov, S. V., & Makeev, V. J. (2008) · BIOPHYSICS · doi:10.1134/s0006350908030019
Quality Assessment of Protein Models
Lee, J. (2011) · Physics and High Technology · doi:10.3938/phit.20.019
A Low-Memory-Requiring and Fast Approach to Cluster Large-Scale Decoy Protein Structures
Yuan, Y.-C., Shang, Y., & Li, H. (2012) · Open Journal of Biophysics · doi:10.4236/ojbiphy.2012.23008
Cheng, W., & Yan, C. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Systems Biology · doi:10.1109/isb.2013.6623804
“Some use functions that model various physical and chemical forces between atoms [10-14].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Web-Accessible Protein Structure Prediction Pipeline
Lee, M. S., Bondugula, R., Desai, V., Zavaljevski, N., Yeh, I., Wallqvist, A., & Jaques Reifman, A. (2009) · DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program Users Group Conference (HPCMP-UGC) · doi:10.1109/hpcmp-ugc.2009.29
“The first scoring program is an in-house implementation of the DFIRE-AA[12], an allatom statistical potential derived from analysis of the inter-atomic distances between pairs of atoms types in a large set of known protein structures.”
MethodInfluentialA Hybrid Consensus and Clustering Method for Protein Structure Selection
Wang, Q., Shang, Y., & Xu, D. H. (2011) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai.2011.10
“In the second phase, a variety of approaches have been proposed to distinguish high-quality candidates from poor ones.”
BackgroundInterpreting Disease Relevance of Amino Acid Substitutions
Vihinen, M. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0025177
StaRProtein, A Web Server for Prediction of the Stability of Repeat Proteins
Xu, Y., Zhou, X., & Huang, M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119417
“Following the concept brought about by Sippl [12],[15], a variety of distancedependent statistical potentials have been developed [16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23].”
BackgroundInfluentialChiu, Y.-Y., Hwang, J.-K., & Yang, J. (2008) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20897
Masso, M. (2010) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2010.35
“Such models may utilize an evolutionary scoring function [4], apply physical [5] [6], statistical [7] [8] [9], or empirical [10] [11] potentials, or implement machine learning tools [12] [13] [14] [15].”
BackgroundLi, Z., Yang, Y., Faraggi, E., Zhan, J., & Zhou, Y. (2014)
A Novel Statistical Potential for Protein beta-Sheets Prediction
Yu, L. (2014) · Rice Research Repository (Rice University)
Chen, T. S. (2012) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
New consensus-based algorithms for quality assessment in protein structure prediction
Vantasin, K. (2010) · doi:10.32469/10355/10570
“Some of the most popular knowledge-based energy scoring functions are OPUSPSP [15], OPUS-Ca [16], DFIRE [17], RAPDF [18] which will be described more in detail in our result section.”
BackgroundProtein structural models selection using 4-mer sequence and combined single and consensus scores
Alazmi, M. (2012) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri)
Simulating, refining and modeling protein structures with multi-scale methods
Wu, Y. (2007) · Rice Research Repository (Rice University)
Mirjalili, V. (2014) · Michigan State University Libraries · doi:10.25335/6rcc-5254
For Peer Review Protein loop modeling by using fragment assembly and analytical loop closure
Lee, J., Lee, D., Coutsias, E. A., & Seok, C. (2010)
DOCTEUR DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE GRENOBLE
Popov, P. A. (2015)
Prediction of Structural and Functional Aspects of Protein
Ingale, A. G. (2014) · Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4940-8.ch016
Scoring Functions for Predicting Structure and Binding of Proteins
Dasgupta, B., & Liang, J. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781119162254.ch02
Nussinov, R., & Schreiber, G. (2009) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420070071-6
Al-Khayyat, M. Z. S. (2015) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences · doi:10.12983/ijsres-2015-p0322-0333
“It estimates if the predicted model at lower energy and closer to the native folds (Zhou and Zhou, 2002).”
BackgroundIdentifying amino acids sensitive to mutations using high-throughput rigidity analysis
Siderius, M., & Jagodzinski, F. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2016.7822779
Genome data analysis, protein function and structure prediction by machine learning techniques
Cao, R. (2016) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · doi:10.32469/10355/57021
“OPUS-CA [55], Dfire [135], ModelEvaluator [82]) to filter out poor models and then used consensus QA method (e.”
MethodNovel approaches in the identification of pathogenic variants in the clinical diagnosis
Riera, C. (2016) · TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)
Template Based Modeling and Structural Refinement of Protein-Protein Interactions.
Govindarajoo, B. (2016) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Flores‐Canales, J. C. (2014) · KiltHub Repository · doi:10.1184/r1/6715289
The mechanism of action of the scorpion toxin, chlorotoxin, a bioinformatics approach
Adnan, S. (2017) · Sheffield Hallam University · doi:10.7190/shu-thesis-00046
Correlating topology and thermodynamics to predict protein structure sensitivity to point mutations
Rodríguez, P. M., Stratmann, D., Duprat, É., Papandreou, N. C., Acuña, R., Lacroix, Z., & Chomilier, J. (2018) · Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems · doi:10.1515/bams-2018-0026
Deep learning methods for protein prediction problem
Nguyen, S. P. (2017) · doi:10.32469/10355/65461
Huang, B., Xu, Y., & Liu, H. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/673897
“(Dong, et al., 2013; Liu, et al., 2014; Ramon Lopez-Blanco and Chacon, 2019; Sippl, 1990; Xu, et al., 2017; Zhou and Zhou, 2002) A distinct feature of SCUBA is that each of its statistical energy terms depends on a multiplex of geometric variables.”
BackgroundPath-LZerD: Predicting Assembly Order of Multimeric Protein Complexes
Terashi, G., Christoffer, C. W., & Kihara, D. (2019) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9873-9_8
Improving Prediction Accuracy via Subspace Modeling
Masso, M. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1785-8.ch003
Using physical features of protein core packing to distinguish real proteins from decoys
Grigas, A. T., Mei, Z., Treado, J. D., Levine, Z. A., Regan, L., & O’Hern, C. S. (2020) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3914
Li, B. (2018) · ProQuest Demo Repository
Tamarozzi, E. R. (2020) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.17.2020.tde-09042021-094503
Ensemble of Protein Stability upon Point Mutation Predictors
de Freitas, E. K. H., Camargo, A., Balboni, M. D. C., Werhli, A. V., & Machado, K. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91699-2_6
Alves, C. C. (2021) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.17.2021.tde-05112021-105440
Koehl, P. (2020) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.737157589.793571661
Correlation of model quality between predicted proteins and their templates
Adilović, M., & Hromić‐Jahjefendić, A. (2022) · Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN) · doi:10.21533/pen.v10.i1.553
王, 骏., 李, 文., 张, 建., 王, 炜., & 苏, 煜. (2007) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/csb2007-52-21-2487
Xu, J., Wang, S., & Ma, J. (2015) · SpringerBriefs in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14914-1_2
Masso, M. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-3604-0.ch054
Prediction of Structural and Functional Aspects of Protein
Ingale, A. G. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1762-7.ch021
Nagaraju, M., & Liu, H. (2022) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798322011858
Lin, Y.-J., Menon, A. S., Hu, Z., & Brenner, S. E. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.06.25.600283
Harnessing deep statistical potential for biophysical scoring of protein-peptide interactions
Jiang, D., Zhao, H., Du, H., Kang, Y., Pan, P., Wu, Z.-X., Zeng, Y., Zhang, O., Wang, X., Wang, J.-K., et al. (2025) · Acta Pharmacologica Sinica · doi:10.1038/s41401-025-01659-8 · Cited by 1
Liu, J., He, G.-X., Zhao, K., Zhou, X., & Zhang, G. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbbio.2025.3630321
Evaluation Metrics and Quality Assessment Methods for Predicted Protein Complex Structures
Zhai, J., Wang, W., Huang, Y., & Gong, X. (2025) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.26599/tst.2025.9010068
StabLyzeGraph : High‐throughput screening of combinatorial mutations using graph neural networks
Waqas, M., Natale, B., Roggia, M., Saha, P. P., Mileni, M., & Cosconati, S. (2026) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.70534
“On the other hand, computational tools offer a promising alternative, and software like FoldX (Schymkowitz et al., 2005), Rasp (Blaabjerg et al., 2023), Rosetta-ddG (Sora et al., 2023), PoPMu-SIC (Dehouck et al., 2011), IMutant3 (Marabotti et al., 2021), and DFire (Zhou & Zhou, 2002) help predict the impact of point m…”
Hoffstedt, M., Wowra, J., Wätzig, H., & Baumann, K. (2026) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2026.2644655
Kadukova, M. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/d5fdc018z1d3fz4af2zb794zae806588d521
Kabir, K. L. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26028-4_21
Wang, X., & Bhattacharya, D. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6c00988
Li, X., Wen, Q., Zhang, Z., & Cui, F. (2026) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2026.108985
Xie, H., Wang, H., Yao, X., Li, J., Pan, Y., Lü, A., Zeng, X., Cao, D., & Fu, X. (2026) · The Innovation Drug Discovery · doi:10.59717/j.xinn-drugdisc.2026.100033
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Yaoqi
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2714-2726
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC2373736
- OpenAlex
- W2125677968
- Cited by
- 902
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- State University of New York
- University at Buffalo
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- knowledge-based potentials, protein structure prediction, protein stability prediction, protein mutants, protein structure database
- MeSH terms
- Mathematics, Models, Theoretical, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Statistics as Topic, Thermodynamics, Protein Folding, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review