The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction
Open accessAbstract
The distance-dependent structure-derived potentials developed so far all employed a reference state that can be characterized as a residue (atom)-averaged state. Here, we establish a new reference state called the distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference (DFIRE) state. The reference state is used to construct a residue-specific all-atom potential of mean force from a database of 1011 nonhomologous (less than 30% homology) protein structures with resolution less than 2 A. The new all-atom potential recognizes more native proteins from 32 multiple decoy sets, and raises an average Z-score by 1.4 units more than two previously developed, residue-specific, all-atom knowledge-based potentials. When only backbone and C(beta) atoms are used in scoring, the performance of the DFIRE-based potential, although is worse than that of the all-atom version, is comparable to those of the previously developed potentials on the all-atom level. In addition, the DFIRE-based all-atom potential provides the most accurate prediction of the stabilities of 895 mutants among three knowledge-based all-atom potentials. Comparison with several physical-based potentials is made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These datasets have been widely used to test the predictive power of the PPI prediction methods [12, 13, 27–29, 29–35].”
From Deep geometric representations for modeling effects of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jorgensen, W. L., Maxwell, D. S., & Tirado-Rives, J. (1996) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9621760 · Cited by 14,078
CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations
Brooks, B., Bruccoleri, R., Olafson, B. D., States, D., Swaminathan, S., & Karplus, M. (1983) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540040211 · Cited by 13,736
Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles
Lüthy, R., Bowie, J., & Eisenberg, D. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/356083a0 · Cited by 3,588
An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids
Weiner, S. J., Kollman, P. A., Nguyen, D. T., & Case, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540070216 · Cited by 3,450
Recognition of errors in three‐dimensional structures of proteins
Sippl, M. J. (1993) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340170404 · Cited by 2,156
Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00442-4 · Cited by 1,728
Miyazawa, S., & Jernigan, R. L. (1985) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00145a039 · Cited by 1,523
The GROMOS Biomolecular Simulation Program Package
Scott, W. R. P., Hünenberger, P. H., Tironi, I. G., Mark, A. E., Billeter, S. R., Fennen, J., Torda, A. E., Huber, T., Krüger, P., & A, W. F. V. G. (1999) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp984217f · Cited by 1,489
Simons, K. T., Kooperberg, C. L., Huang, E. S., & Baker, D. A. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.0959 · Cited by 1,405
Duan, Y., & Kollman, P. A. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5389.740 · Cited by 1,337
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller
Eswar, N., Webb, B., Martı́-Renom, M. A., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eramian, D., Shen, M., Pieper, U., & Šali, A. (2006) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi0506s15 · Cited by 4,618
“They include VERIFY3D (Luthy et al., 1992), PROSAII (Sippl, 1993), HARMONY (Topham et al., 1994), ANOLEA (Melo and Feytmans, 1998), and DFIRE (Zhou and Zhou, 2002).”
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Šali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.3 · Cited by 4,404
“template was used for the modeling. correct equivalences, that is, They include VERIFY3D (Luthy et al., 1992), Prosa2003 (Sippl, 1993; Wiederstein and Sippl, 2007), HARMONY (Topham et al., 1994), ANOLEA (Melo and Feytmans, 1998), DFIRE (Zhou and Zhou, 2002), DOPE (Shen and Sali, 2006), SOAP (Dong et al., 2013), QMEAN…”
InfluentialComparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER
Eswar, N., Webb, B., Martı́-Renom, M. A., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eramian, D., Shen, M., Pieper, U., & Šali, A. (2007) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/0471140864.ps0209s50 · Cited by 2,874
“They include VERIFY3D (Luthy et al., 1992), PROSAII (Sippl, 1993), HARMONY (Topham et al., 1994), ANOLEA (Melo and Feytmans, 1998), and DFIRE (Zhou and Zhou, 2002).”
MethodStatistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures
Shen, M., & Šali, A. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.062416606 · Cited by 2,294
Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models
Benkert, P., Biasini, M., & Schwede, T. F. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq662 · Cited by 2,312
“The performance of QMEAN with respect to other stateof-the-art methods such as ProSA (Sippl, 1993) and DFIRE (Zhou and Zhou, 2002) has also been recently assessed in an independent study (Rykunov and Fiser, 2010).”
BackgroundI-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure
Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki375 · Cited by 2,079
The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources
Kiefer, F., Arnold, K., Künzli, M., Bordoli, L., & Schwede, T. F. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn750 · Cited by 2,003
“Therefore, entries from the Repository can be directly submitted to the Workspace for quality assessment using different global and local quality scores such as DFire ( 45 ), ProQRes (46) or QMEAN (47).”
MethodImproved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations
Yang, J., Anishchenko, I., Park, H., Peng, Z., Ovchinnikov, S., & Baker, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · Cited by 1,421
Krieger, E., Joo, K., Lee, J., Lee, J., Raman, S., Thompson, J., Tyka, M., Baker, D. A., & Karplus, K. J. (2009) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22570 · Cited by 1,396
Protein structure homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL workspace
Bordoli, L., Kiefer, F., Arnold, K., Benkert, P., Battey, J. N. D., & Schwede, T. F. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.197 · Cited by 1,233
Electrostatic Interactions in Protein Structure, Folding, Binding, and Condensation
Zhou, H., & Pang, X. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00305 · Cited by 1,214
Self-citationPrediction of protein stability changes for single‐site mutations using support vector machines
Cheng, J., Randall, A. Z., & Baldi, P. (2005) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20810 · Cited by 1,170
“Statistical potential approaches [16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25] derive potential functions using statistical analysis of the environmental propensities, substitution frequencies, and correlations of contacting residues in solved tertiary structures.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialComparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Šali, A. (2014) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi0506s47 · Cited by 1,156
Xu, D. H., & Zhang, Y. (2011) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.10.024 · Cited by 1,039
“Edfire is the pairwise statistical potential from DFIRE (21), and ELJ is the pairwise physicsbased Lennard-Jones 12-6 potential (22).”
BackgroundQMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment
Benkert, P., Tosatto, S. C. E., & Schomburg, D. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21715 · Cited by 1,030
“…from data of known protein structures and are usually formalized as either distance-dependent or -independent pairwise potentials of mean force.12 –20 Alternatively, statistical potentials have been derived for other structural features such as torsion angles21–25 and solvent accessibility.25 –27…”
BackgroundPerspective: Coarse-grained models for biomolecular systems
Noid, W. G. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4818908 · Cited by 907
QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation
Benkert, P., Künzli, M., & Schwede, T. F. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp322 · Cited by 874
PIPER: An FFT‐based protein docking program with pairwise potentials
Kozakov, D., Brenke, R., Comeau, S. R., & Vajda, S. (2006) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21117 · Cited by 865
Xu, D. H., & Zhang, Y. (2012) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24065 · Cited by 876
Focused Evolution of HIV-1 Neutralizing Antibodies Revealed by Structures and Deep Sequencing
Wu, X., Zhou, T., Zhu, J., Zhang, B., Georgiev, I. S., Wang, C., Chen, X., Longo, N. S., Louder, M. K., McKee, K., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207532 · Cited by 797
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“…(Luthy et al., 1992), Prosa, 2003 (Sippl, 1993; Wiederstein and Sippl, 2007), HARMONY (Topham et al., 1994), ANOLEA (Melo and Feytmans, 1998), DFIRE (Zhou and Zhou, 2002), DOPE (Shen and Sali, 2006), SOAP (Dong et al., 2013), QMEAN local (Benkert et al., 2011), and TSVMod (Eramian et al., 2008).”
BackgroundCUPSAT: prediction of protein stability upon point mutations
Parthiban, V., Gromiha, M. M., & Schomburg, D. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl190 · Cited by 701
Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts
Cavalli, A., Salvatella, X., Dobson, C. M., & Vendruscolo, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610313104 · Cited by 557
HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: New features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets
de Vries, S. J., van Dijk, A. D. J., Krzeminski, M., van Dijk, M., Thureau, A., Hsu, V. L., Wassenaar, T. A., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21723 · Cited by 555
Dehouck, Y., Kwasigroch, J. M., Gilis, D., & Rooman, M. J. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-151 · Cited by 542
“We may distinguish the approaches based on statistical potentials extracted from datasets of protein structures [15-19], from those based on empirical potentials built from optimised combinations of various physical energy terms [20-23].”
MethodBonsignori, M., Hwang, K.-K., Chen, X., Tsao, C.-Y., Morris, L., Gray, E. S., Marshall, D. J., Crump, J. A., Kapiga, S., Sam, N. E., et al. (2011) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.05045-11 · Cited by 424
“evaluated by using a normalized DFIRE score (63).”
MethodThe Stability Effects of Protein Mutations Appear to be Universally Distributed
Tokuriki, N., Stricher, F., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., Serrano, L. G., & Tawfik, D. S. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.069 · Cited by 415
Dehouck, Y., Grosfils, A., Folch, B., Gilis, D., Bogaerts, P., & Rooman, M. J. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp445 · Cited by 403
“Dmutant exploits atom-based distance potentials with a finite ideal gas reference state (Zhou and Zhou, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialComponents of Coated Vesicles and Nuclear Pore Complexes Share a Common Molecular Architecture
Devos, D. P., Dokudovskaya, S., Alber, F., Williams, R., Chait, B. T., Šali, A., & Rout, M. P. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020380 · Cited by 390
“The aim was to improve model assessment by statistical potentials of ProsaII (Sippl 1993) and DFIRE (Zhou and Zhou 2002), and by a composite model evaluation criterion (Melo et al.”
MethodCapriotti, E., Calabrese, R., Fariselli, P., Martelli, P. L., Altman, R. B., & Casadio, R. (2013) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-s3-s6 · Cited by 379
“Thus, during the last few years, several methods have been developed to predict the impact of nsSNPs on protein stability [10-16], protein function [17,18] and to detect their pathologic effect [19-29].”
BackgroundDesign of protein-interaction specificity gives selective bZIP-binding peptides
Grigoryan, G., Reinke, A. W., & Keating, A. E. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07885 · Cited by 343
“Large-scale interaction experiments are becoming more common, and general-purpose models to describe protein structures and energies are under development33, 35–37.”
Molecular Mechanisms of Disease-Causing Missense Mutations
Stefl, S. K., Nishi, H., Petukh, M. G., Panchenko, A. R., & Alexov, E. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.07.014 · Cited by 345
“It is outside of the scope of this review to rank the performance of the existing tools (including Dmutant [73], MultiMutate [74], SCide [75], Scpred [76], SRide [77], nsSNPAnalyzer [78], Panther [79], PhD-SNP [6], SNAP [80] and SNPs&GO [81], among other well-known tools) because different benchmarking papers (see rev…”
BackgroundA three-state prediction of single point mutations on protein stability changes
Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P., Rossi, I., & Casadio, R. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-s2-s6 · Cited by 328
“Some methods developed different energy functions, suited to compute the stability free energy [1-11], while other machine learning approaches [12-15].”
MethodYang, Y., Faraggi, E., Zhao, H., & Zhou, Y. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr350 · Cited by 331
“After that, these different models are linked and steric clashes are removed by using the DFIRE potential functions (Yang and Zhou, 2008; Zhou and Zhou, 2002).”
MethodPerformance of protein stability predictors
Khan, S., & Vihinen, M. (2010) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.21242 · Cited by 324
STRUM: structure-based prediction of protein stability changes upon single-point mutation
Quan, L., Lv, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw361 · Cited by 317
“The first group of energy potentials is the knowledge-based atomic contact potentials by RW/RWplus (Zhang and Zhang, 2010) and Dfire/ dDfire (Yang and Zhou, 2008; Zhou and Zhou, 2002).”
BackgroundMAESTRO - multi agent stability prediction upon point mutations
Laimer, J., Hofer, H., Fritz, M., Wegenkittl, S., & Lackner, P. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0548-6 · Cited by 310
“Structure based tools AUTO-MUTE [7], CUPSAT [8], Dmu-tant [9], FoldX [10], Eris [11], PoPMuSiC [12], SDM [13] or mCSM [14] usually perform better than the sequence based counterparts.”
MethodA Knowledge-Based Energy Function for Protein−Ligand, Protein−Protein, and Protein−DNA Complexes
Zhang, C., Liu, S., Zhu, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm049314d · Cited by 291
Zhou, H., & Skolnick, J. (2011) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.012 · Cited by 271
“For example, in dDFIRE, Yang andZhou (31,34) introduced intoDFIRE the orientation dependence of polar atom interactions (treated as dipoles), which includes hydrogen-bonding interactions, and some improvement over DFIRE (14) in refolding the protein terminal regions with secondary structures was observed.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationGrinter, S. Z., & Zou, X. (2014) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules190710150 · Cited by 271
“A simple ideal gas approximation may be used, and many alternatives have been proposed [81,87–89].”
MethodPremPS: Predicting the impact of missense mutations on protein stability
Chen, Y., Lu, H., Zhang, N., Zhu, Z., Wang, S., & Li, M. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008543 · Cited by 263
Bioinformatics challenges for personalized medicine
Fernald, G. H., Capriotti, E., Daneshjou, R., Karczewski, K. J., & Altman, R. B. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr295 · Cited by 268
“…structural information describes the structural the protein stability change upon mutation (Capriotti et al. , , 2005; Schymkowitz et al. , 2005; Zhou and Zhou, 2002). of the most important features for the prediction of the impact acids are often conserved in protein families and so changes…”
Thusberg, J., & Vihinen, M. (2009) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20938 · Cited by 256
“, 2005], DMUTANT [Zhou and Zhou, 2002], and PoPMuSic [Gilis and Rooman, 2000] calculate mutational free energy changes of the protein based on its 3D structure.”
BackgroundDeepDDG: Predicting the Stability Change of Protein Point Mutations Using Neural Networks
Cao, H., Wang, J., He, L., Qi, Y., & Zhang, J. Z. H. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00697 · Cited by 244
Kastritis, P. L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2010) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr9009854 · Cited by 246
Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures
Yang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21968 · Cited by 245
Self-citationAdvances in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design: A review
Floudas, C. A., Fung, H. K., McAllister, S. R., Mönnigmann, M., & Rajgaria, R. (2005) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2005.04.009 · Cited by 251
“Zhang et al. (2004) presented a simplified version of this all-atom based force field (Zhou and Zhou, 2002) by using the center of mass of side chains.”
InfluentialZhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015386 · Cited by 238
“RAPDF [9], KBP [10], DFIRE [11], DOPE [12], OPUS-PSP [13,14], free-rotating chain-based potential [15], or the more composite TASSER/ITASSER [16,17,18] and ROSETTA [19] potentials], which is derived from the statistical regularities [20] of the solved protein structures in the PDB library [21].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA heavy metal P-type ATPase OsHMA4 prevents copper accumulation in rice grain
Huang, X., Deng, F., Yamaji, N., Pinson, S. R. M., Fujii‐Kashino, M., Danku, J., Douglas, A., Guerinot, M. L., Salt, D. E., & Feng, J. X. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12138 · Cited by 235
iStable: off-the-shelf predictor integration for predicting protein stability changes
Chen, C.-W., Lin, J., & Chu, Y.-W. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-s2-s5 · Cited by 236
“Some of these researched the physical potential [5-7], some were based on statistical potentials [6,8-13] and some on empirical approaches that combined physical and statistical potentials to confer how the protein stability would change upon mutations [14-18]; still others were based on machine learning theories, by…”
Act1, a U-box E3 Ubiquitin Ligase for IL-17 Signaling
Liu, C., Qian, W., Qian, Y., Giltiay, N. V., Lu, Y., Swaidani, S., Misra, S., Deng, L., Chen, Z. J., & Li, X. (2009) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000382 · Cited by 224
“The overall reasonableness of the model geometry and conformation were verified by a number of parameters, including pseudo-energies calculated by QMEAN (−1204 kJ/mol) (25) and DFIRE (−3250 kJ/mol) (26).”
Methodvan Doremalen, N., Miazgowicz, K. L., Milne-Price, S., Bushmaker, T., Robertson, S. J., Scott, D. P., Kinne, J., McLellan, J. S., Zhu, J., & Munster, V. J. (2014) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00676-14 · Cited by 225
Pancera, M., McLellan, J. S., Wu, X., Zhu, J., Changela, A., Schmidt, S. D., Yang, Y., Zhou, T., Phogat, S. K., Mascola, J. R., et al. (2010) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00966-10 · Cited by 222
The state-of-the-art strategies of protein engineering for enzyme stabilization
Liu, Q., Xun, G., & Feng, Y. F. (2018) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.10.011 · Cited by 218
A coarse‐grained protein force field for folding and structure prediction
Maupetit, J., Tufféry, P., & Derreumaux, P. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21505 · Cited by 225
Infection with MERS-CoV Causes Lethal Pneumonia in the Common Marmoset
Falzarano, D., de Wit, E., Feldmann, F., Rasmussen, A. L., Okumura, A., Peng, X., Thomas, M. J., van Doremalen, N., Haddock, E., Nagy, L., et al. (2014) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004250 · Cited by 209
“For the marmoset and ferret DPP4, the RBD/ DPP4 complex model was generated by merging the RBD domain (PDB ID: 4KR0, Chain B) with the DPP4 model, which was then subjected to the binding energy calculation using an all-atom distance-dependent pairwise statistical potential, DFIRE [38].”
MethodPredicting protein stability changes from sequences using support vector machines
Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P., Calabrese, R., & Casadio, R. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1109 · Cited by 194
Liu, S., Zhang, C., Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2004) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20019 · Cited by 193
“) The DFIRE-based potential derived from a structure database of single-chain proteins.(21) The two numbers in each cell represent the rank of native structure and the Z score, respectively.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationVoroMQA: Assessment of protein structure quality using interatomic contact areas
Olechnovič, K., & Venclovas, Č. (2017) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25278 · Cited by 190
“The last required information is the mean and standard deviation values used in equation (9).”
Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2004) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20007 · Cited by 195
Self-citationFrappier, V., Chartier, M., & Najmanovich, R. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv343 · Cited by 181
“RMSE and variance for different linear combinations of methods Methods Parameters Median bootstrapped RMSE Variance A B All Stabilizing Destabilizing A B Shared ENCoM FoldX − 1.12 0.38 1.24 ± 0.14 1.45 ± 0.39 1.40 ± 0.17 0.12 0.24 0.05 ENCoM Rosetta − 1.14 0.46 1.32 ± 0.16 1.70 ± 0.41 1.43 ± 0.21 0.14 0.15 0.04 FoldX…”
BackgroundInfluentialAB ‐Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions
Sirin, S., Apgar, J. R., Bennett, E. M., & Keating, A. E. (2016) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2829 · Cited by 179
“In the top 5% of the entire 1101-variant database, DFIRE, FoldX, and Discovery Studio identified different stabilized variants; only 11 out of 89 total variants with DD G < 2 1.0 kcal/mol were found by all three methods.”
MethodInfluentialA neural-network-based method for predicting protein stability changes upon single point mutations
Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth928 · Cited by 181
“Differently from our approach, all the methods available use the molecular protein structure at different level of representation for predicting the G values after the protein mutation (Gilis and Rooman, 1997; Funahashi et al., 2001; Guerois et al., 2002; Kwasigroch et al., 2002; Zhou and Zhou, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMetaMQAP: A meta-server for the quality assessment of protein models
Pawlowski, M., Gajda, M. J., Matlak, R., & Bujnicki, J. M. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-403 · Cited by 177
“A set of models for given target sequence is clustered together and the clusters are evaluated by MODELLER scoring function [43] and/or DFIRE energy [44].”
MethodStuder, G., Biasini, M., & Schwede, T. F. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu457 · Cited by 184
“However, most scoring functions using knowledge-based methods (Benkert et al., 2011; Luthy et al., 1992; Ray et al., 2012; Sippl, 1993; Zhou and Zhou, 2002) have been trained on soluble proteins.”
MethodInfluentialOPUS-PSP: an orientation-dependent statistical all-atom potential derived from side-chain packing.
Lu, M., Dousis, A., & Ma, J.-P. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.11.033 · Cited by 179
Montanucci, L., Capriotti, E., Frank, Y., Ben-Tal, N., & Fariselli, P. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2923-1 · Cited by 167
“Known structure-based algorithms include Dmutant [3], FoldX [4], I-Mutant2.”
BackgroundSelected‐fit versus induced‐fit protein binding: Kinetic differences and mutational analysis
Weikl, T. R., & von Deuster, C. I. E. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22223 · Cited by 173
“Empirical methods to calculate mutation-induced stability changes of proteins have been investigated intensively in the past years [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29].”
MethodComputational Protein Design with Deep Learning Neural Networks
Wang, J., Cao, H., Zhang, J. Z. H., & Qi, Y. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24760-x · Cited by 164
“58 SPIN was trained on 1532 non-redundant proteins and reaches a sequence identity of 30.3% on a test set containing 500 proteins.”
MethodInfluentialBenkert, P., Schwede, T. F., & Tosatto, S. C. E. (2009) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/1472-6807-9-35 · Cited by 168
“…taking into account evolutionary information [16-18], stereochemical plausibility of the models [19,20] and the environment compatibility of their residues [21] as well as energy-based methods which include physics-based energy functions [22,23] and knowledge-based statistical potentials [24-29].”
DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) potentials for protein-protein docking.
Chuang, G., Kozakov, D., Brenke, R., Comeau, S. R., & Vajda, S. (2008) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.108.135814 · Cited by 162
Evolution of the B3 DNA Binding Superfamily: New Insights into REM Family Gene Diversification
Romanel, E. A. D. C., Schrago, C. G., Couñago, R. M., Russo, C., & Alves‐Ferreira, M. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005791 · Cited by 174
“QMEAN [80] and DFire [84] were used to estimate global model quality.”
MethodA composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models
Eramian, D., Shen, M., Devos, D. P., Melo, F., Šali, A., & Martı́-Renom, M. A. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.062095806 · Cited by 166
“Examples of statistical potentials include ProsaII (Sippl 1993a, b), ANOLEA (Melo and Feytmans 1997, 1998), and DFIRE (Zhou and Zhou 2002; Zhang et al. 2004).”
BackgroundAnalyzing Effects of Naturally Occurring Missense Mutations
Zhang, Z., Miteva, M. A., Wang, L., & Alexov, E. (2012) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2012/805827 · Cited by 173
“(ii) Severe form of phenylketonuria: G46S; human phenylalanine hydroxylase (hPAH); [176] DFIRE [55, 177, 178] PoPMuSiC-2.”
BackgroundThe Hydrophobic Temperature Dependence of Amino Acids Directly Calculated from Protein Structures
van Dijk, E., Hoogeveen, A., & Abeln, S. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004277 · Cited by 162
“[22–27].”
Masso, M., & Vaisman, I. I. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn353 · Cited by 160
“These techniques are derived either from knowledge-based statistical potentials (Gilis and Rooman, 1996, 1997; Hoppe and Schomburg, 2005; Kwasigroch et al., 2002; Meyerguz et al., 2007; Ota et al., 1995; Parthiban et al., 2007; Topham et al., 1997; Wang et al., 1998; Zhou and Zhou, 2002), or from physical descriptions…”
MethodResultModeling Backbone Flexibility Improves Protein Stability Estimation
Yin, S., Ding, F., & Dokholyan, N. V. (2007) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2007.09.024 · Cited by 160
“To our knowledge, protein dynamics and flexibility have not been explicitly modeled inpreviousDDGpredictionmethods.Ignoringproteinflexibility limits the application of current prediction methods to a small range of mutations (Guerois et al., 2002; Zhou and Zhou, 2002 ).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialRegulation of Calcium/Calmodulin-dependent Kinase IV by O-GlcNAc Modification
Dias, W. B., Cheung, W. D., Wang, Z., & Hart, G. W. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.007310 · Cited by 165
Improving the prediction of disease-related variants using protein three-dimensional structure
Capriotti, E., & Altman, R. B. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-s4-s3 · Cited by 150
“These algorithms are able to predict the effect of the mutation on protein stability [13,14,19,23-26], protein functional activity [9,21], and insurgence of human pathologies [7,8,10-12,1518,20-22].”
BackgroundMethodProtein thermostability engineering
Modarres, H. P., Mofrad, M. R. K., & Sanati‐Nezhad, A. (2016) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c6ra16992a · Cited by 150
Automated Protein Structure Modeling with SWISS-MODEL Workspace and the Protein Model Portal
Bordoli, L., & Schwede, T. F. (2011) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-588-6_5 · Cited by 149
“The development of more sophisticated scoring methods, taking into account various aspects of structural and sequence information in order to be able to judge the quality of obtained models (41–45), is currently matter of intensive research.”
MethodZhang, C., Liu, S., Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2004) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.03348304 · Cited by 149
“For all three statistical potentials of mean force (KBP, Lu and Skolnick 2001; RAPDF, Samudrala and Moult 1998; DFIRE, Zhou and Zhou 2002), the potential based on the side-chain center of mass (or center of geometry) is the most accurate one.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationINPS: predicting the impact of non-synonymous variations on protein stability from sequence
Fariselli, P., Martelli, P. L., Savojardo, C., & Casadio, R. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv291 · Cited by 147
“Some of them require the knowledge of the protein structure: AUTO-MUTE (Masso and Vaisman, 2008), CUPSAT (Parthiban et al., 2006), Dmutant (Zhou and Zhou, 2002), FoldX (Guerois et al., 2002), Eris (Yin et al., 2007), PoPMuSiC (Dehouck et al., 2009), SDM (Topham et al., 1997; Worth et al., 2011), mCSM (Pires et al., 20…”
BackgroundInfluentialHow well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted?
Eramian, D., Eswar, N., Shen, M., & Šali, A. (2008) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.036061.108 · Cited by 147
“2002; McGuffin and Jones 2003; Melo and Sali 2007), (2) discriminating between the native and near-native states (Sippl 1993; Melo and Feytmans 1997, 1998; Park et al. 1997; Fiser et al. 2000; Lazaridis and Karplus 2000; Zhou and Zhou 2002; Seok et al. 2003; Tsai et al. 2003; Shen and Sali 2006), (3) selecting the mos…”
BackgroundLoop modeling: Sampling, filtering, and scoring
Soto, C. S., Fasnacht, M., Zhu, J., Forrest, L. R., & Honig, B. H. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21612 · Cited by 146
Near-native structure refinement using in vacuo energy minimization
Summa, C. M., & Levitt, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611593104 · Cited by 142
In quest of an empirical potential for protein structure prediction
Skolnick, J. (2006) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2006.02.004 · Cited by 142
“Although these potentials describe their reference state as an ideal gas, in reality, this state is closer to an ideal solution of noninteracting uniform-size particles [26 ,27].”
BackgroundProtein threading using context-specific alignment potential
Ma, J., Wang, S., Zhao, F., & Xu, J. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt210 · Cited by 141
“Our large-scale experimental test also indicates EPAD is much better than those context-independent distance-based pairwise potentials, such as DOPE (Shen and Sali, 2009), DFIRE (Zhou and Zhou, 2009) and RW (Zhang and Zhang, 2010) in ranking protein alignments (or templatebased models) generated by both threading and…”
BackgroundMethodSingle nucleotide variations: Biological impact and theoretical interpretation
Katsonis, P., Koire, A. M., Wilson, S. J., Hsu, T., Lua, R. C., Wilkins, A. D., & Lichtarge, O. (2014) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2552 · Cited by 145
“Some of the first methods to predict the impact of nsSNVs were based solely on structure.(54,55) They”
MethodLightDock: a new multi-scale approach to protein–protein docking
Jiménez‐García, B., Roel‐Touris, J., Romero‐Durana, M., Vidal, M., Jiménez-González, D., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx555 · Cited by 139
“We tested the performance of LightDock (using default parameters; see Methods) with DFIRE (Zhou and Zhou, 2002) scoring function (LightDock-DFIRE), as well as that of LightDock with a faster implementation of the pyDock (Cheng et al., 2007) scoring function (Supplementary Methods 1.6) called…”
MethodInfluentialYang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2008) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.033480.107 · Cited by 137
“…total of 30 bins, 158 residue-specific atom types with identical atom types merged (e.g., NH1 and NH2 in Arg), while the original DFIRE used a variable bin width (2 Å for the first 2 Å, 0.5 Å from 2 Å and 8 Å, and 1 Å from 8 to 15 Å) and 167 residue-specific atom types (Zhou and Zhou 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEffective protein model structure refinement by loop modeling and overall relaxation
Lee, G. R., Heo, L., & Seok, C. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24858 · Cited by 136
“10,11 Another popular refinement approach is using knowledge-based potentials such as DFIRE,20–22 dDFIRE,11,23 and RAPDF22,24–26 for sampling and/or scoring.”
MethodQuantifying the effect of burial of amino acid residues on protein stability
Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10584 · Cited by 135
“61 is best suited for finite proteins.(6) The potential was generated by using a nonhomologous ( 30% homology) structural database of 1011 soluble proteins with resolution 2 Å.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDeep geometric representations for modeling effects of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity
Liu, X., Luo, Y., Li, P., Song, S., & Peng, J. (2021) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009284 · Cited by 140
“, 2015), DFIRE (Zhou and Zhou, 2002), dDFIRE(Yang and Zhou, 2008), and Rosetta (Humphris and Kortemme, 2008).”
A New Generation of Statistical Potentials for Proteins
Dehouck, Y., Gilis, D., & Rooman, M. J. (2006) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.079434 · Cited by 134
“Several potentials have been tested on the group of decoy sets D(1)str (30,47); the results are summarized in Table 3.”
BackgroundFang, J. (2019) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz071 · Cited by 130
“Force field-based algorithms were also introduced decades ago and are still being actively researched [13–15].”
MethodTransferable Coarse Grain Nonbonded Interaction Model for Amino Acids
DeVane, R., Shinoda, W., Moore, P. B., & Klein, M. L. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct800441u · Cited by 130
Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops
Dong, G. Q., Fan, H., Schneidman‐Duhovny, D., Webb, B., & Šali, A. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt560 · Cited by 129
“First, if we assume that atoms are placed randomly within the protein shell, a recovery function will be similar to the DFIRE and DOPE reference states based on the ideal gas assumption (Shen and Sali, 2006; Zhou and Zhou, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExploring Global Motions and Correlations in the Ribosome
Trylska, J., Tozzini, V., & McCammon, J. A. (2005) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.058495 · Cited by 128
“Boltzmann inversion, whereas molecules are finite systems composed of interacting particles (31,32).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Yaoqi
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2714-2726
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC2373736
- OpenAlex
- W2125677968
- Cited by
- 902
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- State University of New York
- University at Buffalo
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- knowledge-based potentials, protein structure prediction, protein stability prediction, protein mutants, protein structure database
- MeSH terms
- Mathematics, Models, Theoretical, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Statistics as Topic, Thermodynamics, Protein Folding, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review