The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The road to a headland that had become a suicide jumping hotspot was temporarily closed because of construction work.This created an opportunity to assess whether loss of vehicular access would lead to a reduction in suicides and emergency police callouts for threatened suicide at the site.Method: Deaths at the headland were ascertained for a 10 year period before road closure and for 2 years following closure using records from the local police inquest officer, the coroner's pathologist and Marine Search and Rescue.Police provided a list of police callouts for threatened suicide at the site for a 4 year period before closure and for 2 years following closure.Simple rates were compared and incident rate ratios were calculated where possible.Results: There were 13 deaths at the headland involving suicide or open verdicts in the 10 years before access was restricted, and none in the 2 years following road closure.This difference was statistically significant (incident rate difference 0 1.3 deaths per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 00.6Á2.0).No jumping suicides occurred elsewhere in the police district following the road closure.Police callouts for threatened suicide also fell significantly, from 19.3 per year in the 4 years prior to road closure to 9.5 per year for the following 2 years (incident rate ratio 02.0, 95%CI 01.2Á3.5).Conclusions: Preventing vehicular access to a suicide jumping hotspot was an effective means of suicide prevention at the site.There was no evidence of substitution to other jumping sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Suicide prevention through means restriction: Assessing the risk of substitution
Daigle, M. S. (2005) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.03.004 · Cited by 263
Effectiveness of Barriers at Suicide Jumping Sites: A Case Study
Beautrais, A. L. (2001) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/0004867010060501 · Cited by 118
Cited by
Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x · Cited by 2,311
The Prodromal Phase of First-episode Psychosis: Past and Current Conceptualizations
Yung, A. R., & McGorry, P. D. (1996) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/22.2.353 · Cited by 1,168
McGorry, P. D., Hickie, I. B., Yung, A. R., Pantelis, C., & Jackson, H. J. (2006) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01860.x · Cited by 919
Hamza, C. A., Stewart, S. L., & Willoughby, T. (2012) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.05.003 · Cited by 769
Exploring the association between cannabis use and depression.
Degenhardt, L., Hall, W., & Lynskey, M. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00437.x · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Venue
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-07-29
- ISSN
- 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4231356977
- Cited by
- 1,264
- References
- 2
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/(issn)1440-1614
- The paper
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. (2010). Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/(issn)1440-1614
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.