The DOI matches its Crossref record.
British Journal of Pharmacology
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vorinostat and romidepsin are histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDI), approved for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). However, the mechanism(s) by which these drugs exert their anti-cancer effects are not fully understood. Since CTCL is associated with immune dysregulation, we investigated whether these HDI modulated cytokine expression in CTCL cells. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: CTCL cell lines and primary CTCL cells were treated in vitro with vorinostat or romidepsin, or with STAT3 pathway inhibitors. Cell cycle parameters and apoptosis were analysed by propidium iodide and annexin V/propidium iodide staining respectively. Cytokine expression was analysed using QRT-PCR and elisa assays. STAT3 expression/phosphorylation and transcriptional activity were analysed using immunoblotting and transfection/reporter assays respectively. KEY RESULTS: Vorinostat and romidepsin strongly down-regulated expression of the immunosuppressive cytokine, interleukin (IL)-10, frequently overexpressed in CTCL, at both the RNA and protein level in CTCL cell lines and at the RNA level in primary CTCL cells. Vorinostat and romidepsin also increased expression of IFNG RNA and decreased expression of IL-2 and IL-4 RNA, although to a lesser extent compared to IL-10. Transient exposure to vorinostat was sufficient to suppress IL-10 secretion but was not sufficient to irreversibly commit cells to undergo cell death. STAT3 pathway inhibitors decreased production of IL-10 and vorinostat/romidepsin partially decreased STAT3-dependent transcription without effects on STAT3 expression or phosphorylation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results demonstrate that HDI modulate cytokine expression in CTCL cells, potentially via effects on STAT3. Immunomodulation may contribute to the clinical activity of HDI in this disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resistance to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole
Eliopoulos, G. M., & Huovinen, P. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/320532 · Cited by 500
Primaquine Therapy for Malaria
Baird, J. K., & Hoffman, S. L. (2004) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/424663 · Cited by 435
Antibiotic research in the age of omics: from expression profiles to interspecies communication
Wecke, T., & Mascher, T. (2011) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkr373 · Cited by 62
Neural functions of hypothalamic oxytocin and its regulation
Wang, P., Wang, S. C., Liu, X., Jia, S., Wang, X., Li, T., Yu, J., Parpura, V., & Wang, Y.-F. (2022) · ASN Neuro · doi:10.1177/17590914221100706 · Cited by 59
GLP-1 receptor agonist-based therapies and cardiovascular risk: a review of mechanisms
Mullur, N., Morissette, A., Morrow, N. M., & Mulvihill, E. E. (2024) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/joe-24-0046 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-04
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4241291456
- Cited by
- 920
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: British Journal of Pharmacology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/(issn)1476-5381
- The paper
- British Journal of Pharmacology. (2010). British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/(issn)1476-5381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.