The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Institutional Adaptation to Environmental Risk under the Transition in Vietnam
Abstract
This paper develops a theoretical perspective on institutional adaptation to social vulnerability to environmental risks. Institutions encompass both socialized ways of interacting and underlying worldviews, as well as structures and organizations that influence resource allocation. The adaptation of institutions that mediate vulnerability to environmental change can be observed by examining actual resource allocations and the processes of decisionmaking and nondecisionmaking, as well as by examining changing perceptions of vulnerability. Institutional adaptation is evaluated in Nam Dinh Province in northern Vietnam, a country presently undergoing rapid economic and political transition. The case study highlights local-level institutional adaptation to environmental risks associated with flooding and typhoon impacts in the coastal environment. It is carried out through fieldwork involving qualitative household surveys and interviewing to elicit present and recent coping and adaptation strategies in the context of rapid changes in property rights and economic circumstances. Although Vietnam’s transition from state central planning is often heralded as a macroeconomic success story, this study argues that the transition has had negative impacts on social vulnerability. A decrease in collective action for risk management by state institutions is exacerbated by inertia in some aspects of the decentralized state planning system, while the parallel spontaneous reemergence of civil institutions forms a counterbalancing institutional adaptation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x · Cited by 6,796
Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges.
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.278 · Cited by 2,798
Williams, T. I. (1995) · Endeavour · doi:10.1016/0160-9327(95)90078-0 · Cited by 41
Cited by
Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability
Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 · Cited by 5,282
Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change
Adger, W. N. (2003) · Economic Geography · doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x · Cited by 2,542
Self-citationAdaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change
Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002 · Cited by 1,661
Theory and Practice in Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change andFacilitating Adaptation
Kelly, P. M., & Adger, W. N. (2000) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1005627828199 · Cited by 1,630
Self-citationGovernance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems
Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., & Wilson, J. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01606-110119 · Cited by 1,377
Metadata
- Authors
- Adger, W. N.
- Venue
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 738-758
- ISSN
- 0004-5608 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8306
- OpenAlex
- W1996880952
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Institutional Adaptation to Environmental Risk under the Transition in Vietnam. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0004-5608.00220
- The paper
- Adger, W. N. (2000). Institutional Adaptation to Environmental Risk under the Transition in Vietnam. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.