Contemporary Immigration Policy Orientations Among Dominant‐Group Members in Western Europe
Abstract
Predictors of immigration policy attitudes were investigated among members of receiving societies in large national probability samples in 15 Western European countries. We found that a considerable proportion of the variation in immigration policy orientations toward outgroups could be explained by self‐ and group interests and independent measures of perceived threat. Self‐reported racism also contributed independently and significantly to these policy positions. It was concluded that a general framework of proximal self‐ and group‐position indicators (Allport, 1954), perceived threat, and prejudice/racism was useful in predicting the immigrant policy orientations of dominant members of receiving societies across Western Europe. The meaning of these findings for future research on immigration policy orientations across, and especially within, European countries is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relationship between ingroup identification and intergroup hostility averages close to zero.
“In addition, the relationship between ingroup identification and intergroup hostility averages close to zero (e.g., Hinkle & Brown, 1990;Jackson, Brown, Brown, & Marks, 2001;Pehrson et al., 2009).”
From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Jackson, Brown, Brown, & Marks, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4 · Cited by 1,588 · see citing works
Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland
Golec de Zavala, A., & Cichocka, A. (2012) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430211420891 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image
Golec de Zavala, A., Dyduch‐Hazar, K., & Lantos, D. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12569 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Who We Are and Who Can Join Us: National Identity Content and Entry Criteria for New Immigrants
Pehrson, S., & Green, E. G. T. (2010) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01671.x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jackson, J. S., Brown, K. T., Brown, T. N., & Marks, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Macalester College (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 431-456
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2129105859
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Keywords
- immigration policy attitudes, dominant group members, threat perception, self-interest, group interests, racism, prejudice, outgroup attitudes, Western Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review