Cited by 253Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionEuropean Cultural and National Identity

Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland

Golec de Zavala, Agnieszka, Cichocka, Aleksandra·2012·Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Abstract

Two studies examined the relationship between collective narcissism—an emotional investment in an unrealistic belief about the greatness of an in-group (Golec de Zavala, Cichocka, Eidelson, & Jayawickreme, 2009) — and anti-Semitism in Poland. The results indicate that this relationship is simultaneously mediated by (a) a belief that the in-group is constantly threatened by hostile intentions of other groups (Polish siege beliefs; Bar-Tal & Antebi, 1992a , 1992b ) and (b) a belief that the Jews are a particularly threatening out-group because they secretly aim to dominate the world (the conspiracy stereotype of Jews; Bergmann, 2008 ; Kofta & Sędek, 2005 ). These results confirm that collective narcissism predicts prejudice against social groups perceived as threatening. Collective narcissists’ sensitivity to intergroup threat is composed of beliefs about vulnerability of the in-group and hostility of the out-group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1368430211420891

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cohen R., 1991, Attitudes toward Jews in Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia. A comparative survey
  2. Golec de Zavala A., 2007, Paper presented at the ISPP 30th Annual Scientific Meeting
  3. Kruglanski A. W., 2010, Paper presented at Annual Conference of Society of Experimental Social Psychology
  4. Krzemiński I., 2004, Antysemityzm w Polsce i na Ukrainie. Raport z badań
  5. Muthén L. K., 2010, Mplus user’s guide
  6. Wójcik A., 2008, Różni razem, 256

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Golec de Zavala, A., & Cichocka, A.
Affiliations
  • Middlesex University, UK
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
Venue
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2011-10-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
213-229
ISSN
  • 1368-4302 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7188
OpenAlex
W1996818403
Cited by
253
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths Research Online (acceptedVersion)
  • Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › European Cultural and National Identity
Keywords
collective narcissism, antisemitism, intergroup threat, prejudice, outgroup hostility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review