CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109English Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningDigital Communication and Language

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pedagogical Design of Computer Mediated Communication Tasks: Learning Objectives and Technological Capabilities

Salaberry, M. Rafael·2000·The Modern Language Journal
DOI 10.1111/0026-7902.00050
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It has been claimed that the recent emergence of internet‐based communication constitutes a technological innovation with the potential to create a paradigmatic shift in teaching and learning second languages (e.g., Berge & Collins, 1995; Dede, 1993; Harasim, 1990). However, for this shift to happen, materials designers need to assess critically the effects of the techno‐logical capabilities of Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) as well as the features that characterize a potentially new type of literacy. Such a critical assessment will have to be based on the analysis of how specific pedagogical objectives are achieved through the design and implementation of instructional activities in CMC environments. In this respect, the analysis of such theoretical constructs as the grounding criterion and the principle of least collaborative effort (Clark & Brennan, 1991) provides a useful framework for the examination of factors that affect the choice of communication medium. In particular, different learning objectives may be achieved with a variety of technological tools (e.g., from word processors to collaborative writing software) that exhibit a range of levels of technical sophistication.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0026-7902.00050

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 109

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Salaberry, M. R.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Salaberry, M. Rafael
ORCID
Salaberry, M. Rafael
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-03
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
28-37
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
DOI
10.1111/0026-7902.00050
OpenAlex
W2096852389
Cited by
109
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1021 d)
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
Keywords
computer-mediated communication, second language teaching, instructional design, learning objectives, technological capabilities, internet-based communication, computer literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review